背面和正面:通过曼宁、方法论和艺术缝合线和思想

Carlson H. Coogler, Kelly W. Guyotte
{"title":"背面和正面:通过曼宁、方法论和艺术缝合线和思想","authors":"Carlson H. Coogler, Kelly W. Guyotte","doi":"10.7577/rerm.5137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper started with a messy embroidery back and a question: What happens when we play with/in mess, attending to how front/back, process/product, art/research, are counterparts in the event? To answer, we passed embroidery and writing techniques through each other, exploring what becomes possible when you think and make relationally, that is, between. Here, we stitch together Erin Manning’s theorization of the event with our experience. As we attuned ourselves to how thinking back-and-front together mattered, we found that our artful inquiry required us to rethink both what we thought and how we thought. Thus, we found that a methodology of front and back was made in this event, as a result of passing between. Finally, we invite readers to experiment with crafting their own methodologies of the between by flipping over their research as the embroidery hoop, and thereby opening the inquiry to its more-than.","PeriodicalId":414651,"journal":{"name":"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backs and Fronts: Stitching Thread and Thought Through Manning, Methodology, and Art\",\"authors\":\"Carlson H. Coogler, Kelly W. Guyotte\",\"doi\":\"10.7577/rerm.5137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper started with a messy embroidery back and a question: What happens when we play with/in mess, attending to how front/back, process/product, art/research, are counterparts in the event? To answer, we passed embroidery and writing techniques through each other, exploring what becomes possible when you think and make relationally, that is, between. Here, we stitch together Erin Manning’s theorization of the event with our experience. As we attuned ourselves to how thinking back-and-front together mattered, we found that our artful inquiry required us to rethink both what we thought and how we thought. Thus, we found that a methodology of front and back was made in this event, as a result of passing between. Finally, we invite readers to experiment with crafting their own methodologies of the between by flipping over their research as the embroidery hoop, and thereby opening the inquiry to its more-than.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从一个凌乱的刺绣背面开始,并提出了一个问题:当我们在混乱中玩耍时,会发生什么,关注前/后、过程/产品、艺术/研究如何在事件中对应?为了回答这个问题,我们互相传递了刺绣和写作技巧,探索当你思考和制作的关系,即之间,什么是可能的。在这里,我们将艾琳·曼宁对该事件的理论与我们的经历结合起来。当我们意识到前后思考的重要性时,我们发现,我们巧妙的调查需要我们重新思考我们的想法和我们的思考方式。因此,我们发现在这一事件中,由于中间的传递,形成了一种前后方法学。最后,我们邀请读者通过翻转他们的研究作为刺绣箍,从而打开它的更多的调查,以制作自己的方法之间的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Backs and Fronts: Stitching Thread and Thought Through Manning, Methodology, and Art
This paper started with a messy embroidery back and a question: What happens when we play with/in mess, attending to how front/back, process/product, art/research, are counterparts in the event? To answer, we passed embroidery and writing techniques through each other, exploring what becomes possible when you think and make relationally, that is, between. Here, we stitch together Erin Manning’s theorization of the event with our experience. As we attuned ourselves to how thinking back-and-front together mattered, we found that our artful inquiry required us to rethink both what we thought and how we thought. Thus, we found that a methodology of front and back was made in this event, as a result of passing between. Finally, we invite readers to experiment with crafting their own methodologies of the between by flipping over their research as the embroidery hoop, and thereby opening the inquiry to its more-than.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信