2020/21学年初新冠肺炎疫情期间学生应急远程教学体验

A. Chan, Kay Daigle
{"title":"2020/21学年初新冠肺炎疫情期间学生应急远程教学体验","authors":"A. Chan, Kay Daigle","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the contagious disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a number of health and safety measures were enacted across Canada in March 2020. These measures included the physical closure of postsecondary institutions, including the authors’ institution Carleton University. The physical closure resulted in an abrupt transition from normal in-person teaching to emergency remote teaching (the term emergency remote teaching is used to distinguish it from online teaching, which is not subject to the challenges and constraints associated with an emergency situation).\nEmergency remote teaching continued at Carleton University for the entire 2020/21 academic year. There were increased resources, training opportunities, supports, and time to prepare for teaching, as compared to the sudden change in the Winter 2020 term. Simultaneously, there were still many ongoing challenges and constraints in the pursuit of optimal remote teaching and learning. Midway through the Fall 2020 term, a questionnaire on the student experience with emergency remote teaching was developed and delivered to undergraduate students in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University. This paper presents the findings of this questionnaire from the 159 respondents.\nResults suggest that, on average, academic and intellectual student engagement was slightly worse for emergency remote teaching versus normal in-person teaching. Emergency remote teaching posed some difficulties and challenges, but also provided some advantages that were preferred (e.g., less travel time, ability to rewatch asynchronous lectures). There was a notable worsening of social student engagement, which was associated with increased feelings of isolation and decreased mental health and well-being. There was also a number of students who faced technical barriers with respect to remote teaching, with only 22% indicating that they experienced few or inconsequential technical barriers.\nThis research adds to the discourse on emergency remote teaching, including the lens of engineering education. The paper can help inform future transitions to emergency remote teaching, with some insights potentially useful for online teaching, which is anticipated to continue to increase in its prevalence.","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Experience of Emergency Remote Teaching During COVID-19 Early in the 2020/21 Academic Year\",\"authors\":\"A. Chan, Kay Daigle\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pceea.vi.15828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In response to the contagious disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a number of health and safety measures were enacted across Canada in March 2020. These measures included the physical closure of postsecondary institutions, including the authors’ institution Carleton University. The physical closure resulted in an abrupt transition from normal in-person teaching to emergency remote teaching (the term emergency remote teaching is used to distinguish it from online teaching, which is not subject to the challenges and constraints associated with an emergency situation).\\nEmergency remote teaching continued at Carleton University for the entire 2020/21 academic year. There were increased resources, training opportunities, supports, and time to prepare for teaching, as compared to the sudden change in the Winter 2020 term. Simultaneously, there were still many ongoing challenges and constraints in the pursuit of optimal remote teaching and learning. Midway through the Fall 2020 term, a questionnaire on the student experience with emergency remote teaching was developed and delivered to undergraduate students in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University. This paper presents the findings of this questionnaire from the 159 respondents.\\nResults suggest that, on average, academic and intellectual student engagement was slightly worse for emergency remote teaching versus normal in-person teaching. Emergency remote teaching posed some difficulties and challenges, but also provided some advantages that were preferred (e.g., less travel time, ability to rewatch asynchronous lectures). There was a notable worsening of social student engagement, which was associated with increased feelings of isolation and decreased mental health and well-being. There was also a number of students who faced technical barriers with respect to remote teaching, with only 22% indicating that they experienced few or inconsequential technical barriers.\\nThis research adds to the discourse on emergency remote teaching, including the lens of engineering education. The paper can help inform future transitions to emergency remote teaching, with some insights potentially useful for online teaching, which is anticipated to continue to increase in its prevalence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对2019年传染性冠状病毒病(COVID-19),加拿大于2020年3月颁布了一系列健康和安全措施。这些措施包括实际关闭高等教育机构,包括作者所在的卡尔顿大学。物理封闭导致从正常的面对面教学突然转变为紧急远程教学(使用紧急远程教学一词是为了将其与在线教学区分开来,后者不受与紧急情况相关的挑战和限制)。卡尔顿大学在整个2020/21学年继续进行紧急远程教学。与2020年冬季学期的突然变化相比,有更多的资源、培训机会、支持和准备教学的时间。同时,在实现最佳远程教学的过程中,仍存在许多挑战和制约因素。在2020年秋季学期中期,一份关于学生紧急远程教学体验的调查问卷被开发出来,并分发给卡尔顿大学系统与计算机工程系的本科生。本文介绍了159名受访者的调查结果。结果表明,平均而言,在紧急远程教学中,学生的学术和智力参与度略低于正常的面对面教学。紧急远程教学带来了一些困难和挑战,但也提供了一些首选的优势(例如,更少的旅行时间,能够重新观看异步讲座)。学生的社会参与度明显恶化,这与孤立感增加、心理健康和幸福感下降有关。还有一些学生在远程教学方面面临技术障碍,只有22%的学生表示他们经历了很少或无关紧要的技术障碍。本研究增加了应急远程教学的论述,包括工程教育的镜头。该论文有助于为未来向紧急远程教学的过渡提供信息,其中一些见解可能对在线教学有用,预计在线教学的普及程度将继续增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Experience of Emergency Remote Teaching During COVID-19 Early in the 2020/21 Academic Year
In response to the contagious disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a number of health and safety measures were enacted across Canada in March 2020. These measures included the physical closure of postsecondary institutions, including the authors’ institution Carleton University. The physical closure resulted in an abrupt transition from normal in-person teaching to emergency remote teaching (the term emergency remote teaching is used to distinguish it from online teaching, which is not subject to the challenges and constraints associated with an emergency situation). Emergency remote teaching continued at Carleton University for the entire 2020/21 academic year. There were increased resources, training opportunities, supports, and time to prepare for teaching, as compared to the sudden change in the Winter 2020 term. Simultaneously, there were still many ongoing challenges and constraints in the pursuit of optimal remote teaching and learning. Midway through the Fall 2020 term, a questionnaire on the student experience with emergency remote teaching was developed and delivered to undergraduate students in the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University. This paper presents the findings of this questionnaire from the 159 respondents. Results suggest that, on average, academic and intellectual student engagement was slightly worse for emergency remote teaching versus normal in-person teaching. Emergency remote teaching posed some difficulties and challenges, but also provided some advantages that were preferred (e.g., less travel time, ability to rewatch asynchronous lectures). There was a notable worsening of social student engagement, which was associated with increased feelings of isolation and decreased mental health and well-being. There was also a number of students who faced technical barriers with respect to remote teaching, with only 22% indicating that they experienced few or inconsequential technical barriers. This research adds to the discourse on emergency remote teaching, including the lens of engineering education. The paper can help inform future transitions to emergency remote teaching, with some insights potentially useful for online teaching, which is anticipated to continue to increase in its prevalence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信