用DEA衡量平衡效率:德国商学院研究绩效的新方法与案例研究

H. Dyckhoff, Alexander Dirksen, Eleazar Mbock
{"title":"用DEA衡量平衡效率:德国商学院研究绩效的新方法与案例研究","authors":"H. Dyckhoff, Alexander Dirksen, Eleazar Mbock","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1990233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cone ratios, assurance regions and similar data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches measuring the efficiency of decision making units (DMU) restrict their ability to “show themselves in the most favorable light”. Indeed they limit the relations or the multipliers of inputs and outputs as efficiency factors and thus induce a certain balance among them. We develop an alternative approach which – based on the conventional DEA methodology and additionally to the usual efficiency score – assesses a degree of balance or balanced efficiency for each DMU. For that purpose we assume that a region within the data envelopment can be specified in which all DMUs are 100% balanced. In a case study, measuring the balanced effectiveness of German business schools’ research performance, we obtain plausible results providing informative insights into German business research. This confirms the reasonable use of the new method.","PeriodicalId":239750,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Microeconomic Policy eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Balanced Efficiency with DEA: New Approach and Case Study of German Business Schools' Research Performance\",\"authors\":\"H. Dyckhoff, Alexander Dirksen, Eleazar Mbock\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1990233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cone ratios, assurance regions and similar data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches measuring the efficiency of decision making units (DMU) restrict their ability to “show themselves in the most favorable light”. Indeed they limit the relations or the multipliers of inputs and outputs as efficiency factors and thus induce a certain balance among them. We develop an alternative approach which – based on the conventional DEA methodology and additionally to the usual efficiency score – assesses a degree of balance or balanced efficiency for each DMU. For that purpose we assume that a region within the data envelopment can be specified in which all DMUs are 100% balanced. In a case study, measuring the balanced effectiveness of German business schools’ research performance, we obtain plausible results providing informative insights into German business research. This confirms the reasonable use of the new method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategy & Microeconomic Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategy & Microeconomic Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Microeconomic Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

锥比、保证区域和类似的数据包络分析(DEA)方法衡量决策单元(DMU)的效率,限制了它们“以最有利的方式展示自己”的能力。事实上,它们将投入和产出的关系或乘数限制为效率因素,从而在它们之间引起某种平衡。我们开发了一种替代方法,该方法基于传统的DEA方法,并在通常的效率评分的基础上,评估每个DMU的平衡程度或平衡效率。为此,我们假设可以指定数据包络内的一个区域,其中所有dmu都是100%平衡的。在一个案例研究中,我们衡量了德国商学院研究绩效的平衡有效性,得出了可信的结果,为德国商业研究提供了翔实的见解。这证实了新方法的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Balanced Efficiency with DEA: New Approach and Case Study of German Business Schools' Research Performance
Cone ratios, assurance regions and similar data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches measuring the efficiency of decision making units (DMU) restrict their ability to “show themselves in the most favorable light”. Indeed they limit the relations or the multipliers of inputs and outputs as efficiency factors and thus induce a certain balance among them. We develop an alternative approach which – based on the conventional DEA methodology and additionally to the usual efficiency score – assesses a degree of balance or balanced efficiency for each DMU. For that purpose we assume that a region within the data envelopment can be specified in which all DMUs are 100% balanced. In a case study, measuring the balanced effectiveness of German business schools’ research performance, we obtain plausible results providing informative insights into German business research. This confirms the reasonable use of the new method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信