腹主动脉瘤破裂风险评估的生物力学和血流动力学观点

N. Kontopodis, K. Tzirakis, E. Tavlas, S. Lioudaki, C. Ioannou
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤破裂风险评估的生物力学和血流动力学观点","authors":"N. Kontopodis, K. Tzirakis, E. Tavlas, S. Lioudaki, C. Ioannou","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose a significant source of mortality for the elderly, especially if they go on undetected and ultimately rupture. Therefore, elective repair of these lesions is recommended in order to avoid risk of rupture which is associ - ated with high mortality. Currently, the risk of rupture and thus the indication to inter vene is evaluated based on the size of the AAA as determined by its maximum diameter. Since AAAs actually present original geometric configurations and unique hemody namic and biomechanic conditions, it is expected that other variables may affect rup - ture risk as well. This is the reason why the maximum diameter criterion has often been proven inaccurate. The biomechanical approach considers rupture as a material failure where the stresses exerted on the wall outweigh its strength. Therefore, rupture depends on the pointwise comparison of the stress and strength for every point of the aneurysmal surface. Moreover, AAAs hemodynamics play an essential role in AAAs natural history, progression and rupture. This chapter summarizes advances in AAAs rupture risk esti - mation beyond the “one size fits all” maximum diameter criterion.","PeriodicalId":448129,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - From Basic Research to Clinical Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanic and Hemodynamic Perspectives in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"N. Kontopodis, K. Tzirakis, E. Tavlas, S. Lioudaki, C. Ioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose a significant source of mortality for the elderly, especially if they go on undetected and ultimately rupture. Therefore, elective repair of these lesions is recommended in order to avoid risk of rupture which is associ - ated with high mortality. Currently, the risk of rupture and thus the indication to inter vene is evaluated based on the size of the AAA as determined by its maximum diameter. Since AAAs actually present original geometric configurations and unique hemody namic and biomechanic conditions, it is expected that other variables may affect rup - ture risk as well. This is the reason why the maximum diameter criterion has often been proven inaccurate. The biomechanical approach considers rupture as a material failure where the stresses exerted on the wall outweigh its strength. Therefore, rupture depends on the pointwise comparison of the stress and strength for every point of the aneurysmal surface. Moreover, AAAs hemodynamics play an essential role in AAAs natural history, progression and rupture. This chapter summarizes advances in AAAs rupture risk esti - mation beyond the “one size fits all” maximum diameter criterion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - From Basic Research to Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - From Basic Research to Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - From Basic Research to Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)是老年人死亡的一个重要原因,特别是如果它们未被发现并最终破裂。因此,建议选择性修复这些病变,以避免与高死亡率相关的破裂风险。目前,根据AAA的最大直径确定其大小来评估其破裂的风险和介入的适应症。由于AAAs实际上具有原始的几何构型和独特的血流动力学和生物力学条件,因此预计其他变量也可能影响骨折风险。这就是为什么最大直径标准经常被证明是不准确的原因。生物力学方法将破裂视为施加在壁面上的应力超过其强度的材料破坏。因此,破裂取决于动脉瘤表面每个点的应力和强度的逐点比较。此外,AAAs血流动力学在AAAs的自然历史、进展和破裂中起着至关重要的作用。本章总结了AAAs在“一刀切”最大直径标准之外的破裂风险评估的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanic and Hemodynamic Perspectives in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose a significant source of mortality for the elderly, especially if they go on undetected and ultimately rupture. Therefore, elective repair of these lesions is recommended in order to avoid risk of rupture which is associ - ated with high mortality. Currently, the risk of rupture and thus the indication to inter vene is evaluated based on the size of the AAA as determined by its maximum diameter. Since AAAs actually present original geometric configurations and unique hemody namic and biomechanic conditions, it is expected that other variables may affect rup - ture risk as well. This is the reason why the maximum diameter criterion has often been proven inaccurate. The biomechanical approach considers rupture as a material failure where the stresses exerted on the wall outweigh its strength. Therefore, rupture depends on the pointwise comparison of the stress and strength for every point of the aneurysmal surface. Moreover, AAAs hemodynamics play an essential role in AAAs natural history, progression and rupture. This chapter summarizes advances in AAAs rupture risk esti - mation beyond the “one size fits all” maximum diameter criterion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信