内幕交易、盈余质量和应计错误定价

Mark E. Vargus, M. Beneish
{"title":"内幕交易、盈余质量和应计错误定价","authors":"Mark E. Vargus, M. Beneish","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.275985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates whether insider trading is informative about earnings quality and the valuation implications of accruals. We show that (1) the one‐year‐ahead persistence of income‐increasing accruals is significantly lower when accompanied by abnormal insider selling and greater when accompanied by abnormal insider buying; (2) the accrual mispricing phenomenon observed in previous work (e.g., Sloan 1996) is due to the mispricing of income‐increasing accruals; (3) one‐year‐ahead hedge returns to trading strategies based on the direction of accruals and insider trading significantly exceed those based on accruals alone; and (4) the lower persistence of income‐increasing accruals accompanied by abnormal insider selling appears to be at least partly attributable to opportunistic earnings management. Our evidence suggests that market participants and researchers can use managers' contemporaneous trading in ex ante assessing the likelihood that the firms' accruals are of high or low quality, and in asse...","PeriodicalId":412480,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"566","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insider Trading, Earnings Quality, and Accrual Mispricing\",\"authors\":\"Mark E. Vargus, M. Beneish\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.275985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates whether insider trading is informative about earnings quality and the valuation implications of accruals. We show that (1) the one‐year‐ahead persistence of income‐increasing accruals is significantly lower when accompanied by abnormal insider selling and greater when accompanied by abnormal insider buying; (2) the accrual mispricing phenomenon observed in previous work (e.g., Sloan 1996) is due to the mispricing of income‐increasing accruals; (3) one‐year‐ahead hedge returns to trading strategies based on the direction of accruals and insider trading significantly exceed those based on accruals alone; and (4) the lower persistence of income‐increasing accruals accompanied by abnormal insider selling appears to be at least partly attributable to opportunistic earnings management. Our evidence suggests that market participants and researchers can use managers' contemporaneous trading in ex ante assessing the likelihood that the firms' accruals are of high or low quality, and in asse...\",\"PeriodicalId\":412480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"566\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.275985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.275985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 566

摘要

本文探讨内幕交易是否对盈余质量和应计项目的估值影响提供信息。结果表明:(1)当存在异常内幕交易时,未来一年应计收益的持续性显著降低,而当存在异常内幕交易时,未来一年应计收益的持续性显著提高;(2)以前的研究(如Sloan 1996)中观察到的应计项目错误定价现象是由于对增加收入的应计项目的错误定价;(3)基于应计收益和内幕交易方向的交易策略的1年远期对冲收益显著高于仅基于应计收益的对冲收益;(4)伴随异常内幕出售的应计收益增长持续性较低似乎至少部分归因于机会性盈余管理。我们的证据表明,市场参与者和研究人员可以使用经理人的同期交易来预先评估公司应计收益质量高或低的可能性,并且在asse…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insider Trading, Earnings Quality, and Accrual Mispricing
This paper investigates whether insider trading is informative about earnings quality and the valuation implications of accruals. We show that (1) the one‐year‐ahead persistence of income‐increasing accruals is significantly lower when accompanied by abnormal insider selling and greater when accompanied by abnormal insider buying; (2) the accrual mispricing phenomenon observed in previous work (e.g., Sloan 1996) is due to the mispricing of income‐increasing accruals; (3) one‐year‐ahead hedge returns to trading strategies based on the direction of accruals and insider trading significantly exceed those based on accruals alone; and (4) the lower persistence of income‐increasing accruals accompanied by abnormal insider selling appears to be at least partly attributable to opportunistic earnings management. Our evidence suggests that market participants and researchers can use managers' contemporaneous trading in ex ante assessing the likelihood that the firms' accruals are of high or low quality, and in asse...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信