{"title":"预测一阶保持电路","authors":"B. Bernhardsson","doi":"10.1109/CDC.1990.203948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The predictive first order hold circuit is introduced and analyzed. The main advantage of this hold circuit is that it gives a continuous control signal. Conditions for causality and a pole placement procedure are presented. Formulas for sampling a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) problem are given and are used to analyze an example where the predictive first order hold gives better performance than the best zero order hold control law.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":287089,"journal":{"name":"29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive first order hold circuit\",\"authors\":\"B. Bernhardsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CDC.1990.203948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The predictive first order hold circuit is introduced and analyzed. The main advantage of this hold circuit is that it gives a continuous control signal. Conditions for causality and a pole placement procedure are presented. Formulas for sampling a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) problem are given and are used to analyze an example where the predictive first order hold gives better performance than the best zero order hold control law.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1990.203948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1990.203948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The predictive first order hold circuit is introduced and analyzed. The main advantage of this hold circuit is that it gives a continuous control signal. Conditions for causality and a pole placement procedure are presented. Formulas for sampling a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) problem are given and are used to analyze an example where the predictive first order hold gives better performance than the best zero order hold control law.<>