利用静态回溯分析加速嵌入式固件命令注入漏洞发现

Xiaokang Yin, Ruijie Cai, Yizheng Zhang, Lukai Li, Qichao Yang, Shengli Liu
{"title":"利用静态回溯分析加速嵌入式固件命令注入漏洞发现","authors":"Xiaokang Yin, Ruijie Cai, Yizheng Zhang, Lukai Li, Qichao Yang, Shengli Liu","doi":"10.1145/3567445.3567458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Command injection vulnerability is a severe threat to the embedded device. Most methods detect command injection vulnerability with taint analysis and symbolic execution and achieve promising results. However, they waste too much time analyzing secure sink call-sites, resulting in less efficient vulnerability detection. To tackle the above problem, we propose a novel sink call-site classification method named CINDY to accelerate the command injection vulnerability discovery in embedded firmware with static backtracking analysis. CINDY first performs sink call-sites detection in the binary executables and constructs the data flow for function call parameters. Then, CINDY analyzes whether the parameters passed to sink functions are derived from constant string or not and labels them “secure\" or “risky\". According to the labels, CINDY classifies the sink call-sites into risky and secure sink call-sites. Finally, CINDY performs taint analysis with symbolic execution to check whether a risky sink call-site is vulnerable. To demonstrate the efficacy of CINDY, we compare CINDY with the state-of-the-art method SaTC, using the dataset published by SaTC. Compared with SaTC, CINDY can filter out more of the secure sink call-sites, with a 35% decrease, and the efficiency is improved by 17% than SaTC.","PeriodicalId":152960,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Internet of Things","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerating Command Injection Vulnerability Discovery in Embedded Firmware with Static Backtracking Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiaokang Yin, Ruijie Cai, Yizheng Zhang, Lukai Li, Qichao Yang, Shengli Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3567445.3567458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Command injection vulnerability is a severe threat to the embedded device. Most methods detect command injection vulnerability with taint analysis and symbolic execution and achieve promising results. However, they waste too much time analyzing secure sink call-sites, resulting in less efficient vulnerability detection. To tackle the above problem, we propose a novel sink call-site classification method named CINDY to accelerate the command injection vulnerability discovery in embedded firmware with static backtracking analysis. CINDY first performs sink call-sites detection in the binary executables and constructs the data flow for function call parameters. Then, CINDY analyzes whether the parameters passed to sink functions are derived from constant string or not and labels them “secure\\\" or “risky\\\". According to the labels, CINDY classifies the sink call-sites into risky and secure sink call-sites. Finally, CINDY performs taint analysis with symbolic execution to check whether a risky sink call-site is vulnerable. To demonstrate the efficacy of CINDY, we compare CINDY with the state-of-the-art method SaTC, using the dataset published by SaTC. Compared with SaTC, CINDY can filter out more of the secure sink call-sites, with a 35% decrease, and the efficiency is improved by 17% than SaTC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Internet of Things\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Internet of Things\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3567445.3567458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3567445.3567458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

命令注入漏洞是对嵌入式设备的严重威胁。大多数方法通过污染分析和符号执行来检测命令注入漏洞,并取得了令人满意的结果。然而,它们浪费了太多的时间来分析安全接收器调用站点,导致漏洞检测效率较低。针对上述问题,我们提出了一种新的sink - call-site分类方法CINDY,通过静态回溯分析加速嵌入式固件命令注入漏洞的发现。CINDY首先在二进制可执行文件中执行接收调用位置检测,并为函数调用参数构造数据流。然后,CINDY分析传递给sink函数的参数是否来自常量字符串,并将其标记为“安全”或“危险”。根据标签,CINDY将汇聚呼叫站点分为风险和安全两类。最后,CINDY使用符号执行进行污染分析,以检查有风险的接收调用站点是否易受攻击。为了证明CINDY的有效性,我们使用SaTC发布的数据集将CINDY与最先进的方法SaTC进行了比较。与SaTC相比,CINDY可以过滤掉更多的安全汇聚呼叫站点,比SaTC减少了35%,效率提高了17%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerating Command Injection Vulnerability Discovery in Embedded Firmware with Static Backtracking Analysis
Command injection vulnerability is a severe threat to the embedded device. Most methods detect command injection vulnerability with taint analysis and symbolic execution and achieve promising results. However, they waste too much time analyzing secure sink call-sites, resulting in less efficient vulnerability detection. To tackle the above problem, we propose a novel sink call-site classification method named CINDY to accelerate the command injection vulnerability discovery in embedded firmware with static backtracking analysis. CINDY first performs sink call-sites detection in the binary executables and constructs the data flow for function call parameters. Then, CINDY analyzes whether the parameters passed to sink functions are derived from constant string or not and labels them “secure" or “risky". According to the labels, CINDY classifies the sink call-sites into risky and secure sink call-sites. Finally, CINDY performs taint analysis with symbolic execution to check whether a risky sink call-site is vulnerable. To demonstrate the efficacy of CINDY, we compare CINDY with the state-of-the-art method SaTC, using the dataset published by SaTC. Compared with SaTC, CINDY can filter out more of the secure sink call-sites, with a 35% decrease, and the efficiency is improved by 17% than SaTC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信