{"title":"文件服务器中无状态的适当数量是多少?","authors":"J. Mogul","doi":"10.1109/WWOS.1989.109272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that although the stateless server model has proved quite useful to network file systems, statelessness is a means to an end and should not be an end in itself. The author maintains that statelessness can be a severe impediment to building efficient, reliable systems. He concludes that if its actual advantages can be preserved in a stateful system without too much effort, statelessness as a dogma should be discarded.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":342782,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the right amount of statelessness in a file server?\",\"authors\":\"J. Mogul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WWOS.1989.109272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is argued that although the stateless server model has proved quite useful to network file systems, statelessness is a means to an end and should not be an end in itself. The author maintains that statelessness can be a severe impediment to building efficient, reliable systems. He concludes that if its actual advantages can be preserved in a stateful system without too much effort, statelessness as a dogma should be discarded.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":342782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WWOS.1989.109272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WWOS.1989.109272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the right amount of statelessness in a file server?
It is argued that although the stateless server model has proved quite useful to network file systems, statelessness is a means to an end and should not be an end in itself. The author maintains that statelessness can be a severe impediment to building efficient, reliable systems. He concludes that if its actual advantages can be preserved in a stateful system without too much effort, statelessness as a dogma should be discarded.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
