双门静脉内窥镜颈椎手术并发症概述及预防

Sang-Hyuk Park, Jung Hwan Lee, C. Chough
{"title":"双门静脉内窥镜颈椎手术并发症概述及预防","authors":"Sang-Hyuk Park, Jung Hwan Lee, C. Chough","doi":"10.21182/jmisst.2023.00808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular for various spinal pathologies, including cervical and thoracic spine diseases. However, the safety of biportal endoscopic cervical spine surgery (BECSS) has not been fully investigated, and inexperienced surgeons can cause serious complications. The study aimed to evaluate the complications of BECSS and identify tips for preventing them through a literature review and retrospective analysis of case series. Methods: Articles on BECSS were electronically retrieved from multiple databases, with inclusion criteria including controlled and case series designs, detailed reporting of complications and/or reoperations, and the use of BECSS. The study excluded simple review articles and case reports. The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent BECSS at our institution were collected, and information was extracted on demographic features, surgery type, surgical level, surgery-related complications, and reoperations and their reasons.Results: The study retrieved a total of 67 studies from 5 databases, of which 6 were included after screening. In total, 227 cases of BECSS were identified, and the overall complication rate was 0%–14.3%. Complications included dura tearing, symptom recurrence, incomplete decompression, postoperative epidural hematoma, and transient paralysis. Reoperation was performed in 3 cases.Conclusion: BECSS has similar complication rates to those of other surgical techniques. It is important to provide extensive education, share knowledge and experience, and conduct further research to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients, as is the case with other spinal surgical procedures.","PeriodicalId":405058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview and Prevention of Complications During Biportal Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Hyuk Park, Jung Hwan Lee, C. Chough\",\"doi\":\"10.21182/jmisst.2023.00808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular for various spinal pathologies, including cervical and thoracic spine diseases. However, the safety of biportal endoscopic cervical spine surgery (BECSS) has not been fully investigated, and inexperienced surgeons can cause serious complications. The study aimed to evaluate the complications of BECSS and identify tips for preventing them through a literature review and retrospective analysis of case series. Methods: Articles on BECSS were electronically retrieved from multiple databases, with inclusion criteria including controlled and case series designs, detailed reporting of complications and/or reoperations, and the use of BECSS. The study excluded simple review articles and case reports. The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent BECSS at our institution were collected, and information was extracted on demographic features, surgery type, surgical level, surgery-related complications, and reoperations and their reasons.Results: The study retrieved a total of 67 studies from 5 databases, of which 6 were included after screening. In total, 227 cases of BECSS were identified, and the overall complication rate was 0%–14.3%. Complications included dura tearing, symptom recurrence, incomplete decompression, postoperative epidural hematoma, and transient paralysis. Reoperation was performed in 3 cases.Conclusion: BECSS has similar complication rates to those of other surgical techniques. It is important to provide extensive education, share knowledge and experience, and conduct further research to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients, as is the case with other spinal surgical procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2023.00808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2023.00808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术在各种脊柱疾病,包括颈椎和胸椎疾病中越来越受欢迎。然而,双门静脉内窥镜颈椎手术(BECSS)的安全性尚未得到充分的研究,缺乏经验的外科医生可能导致严重的并发症。本研究旨在通过文献回顾和病例系列回顾性分析来评估BECSS的并发症,并确定预防这些并发症的提示。方法:从多个数据库中电子检索有关BECSS的文章,纳入标准包括对照和病例系列设计,并发症和/或再手术的详细报告,以及BECSS的使用。该研究排除了简单的综述文章和病例报告。收集我院45例行BECSS患者的临床资料,提取人口学特征、手术类型、手术水平、手术相关并发症、再手术及其原因等信息。结果:本研究共从5个数据库中检索到67篇研究,经筛选后纳入6篇。共发现BECSS 227例,总并发症发生率为0% ~ 14.3%。并发症包括硬脑膜撕裂、症状复发、不完全减压、术后硬膜外血肿和一过性麻痹。再次手术3例。结论:BECSS的并发症发生率与其他手术方式相似。与其他脊柱外科手术一样,重要的是提供广泛的教育,分享知识和经验,并开展进一步的研究,以尽量减少并发症并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overview and Prevention of Complications During Biportal Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery
Purpose: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular for various spinal pathologies, including cervical and thoracic spine diseases. However, the safety of biportal endoscopic cervical spine surgery (BECSS) has not been fully investigated, and inexperienced surgeons can cause serious complications. The study aimed to evaluate the complications of BECSS and identify tips for preventing them through a literature review and retrospective analysis of case series. Methods: Articles on BECSS were electronically retrieved from multiple databases, with inclusion criteria including controlled and case series designs, detailed reporting of complications and/or reoperations, and the use of BECSS. The study excluded simple review articles and case reports. The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent BECSS at our institution were collected, and information was extracted on demographic features, surgery type, surgical level, surgery-related complications, and reoperations and their reasons.Results: The study retrieved a total of 67 studies from 5 databases, of which 6 were included after screening. In total, 227 cases of BECSS were identified, and the overall complication rate was 0%–14.3%. Complications included dura tearing, symptom recurrence, incomplete decompression, postoperative epidural hematoma, and transient paralysis. Reoperation was performed in 3 cases.Conclusion: BECSS has similar complication rates to those of other surgical techniques. It is important to provide extensive education, share knowledge and experience, and conduct further research to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients, as is the case with other spinal surgical procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信