在连续项目发布中重用组件的单元验证效果

Tihana Galinac Grbac, P. Runeson, D. Huljenic
{"title":"在连续项目发布中重用组件的单元验证效果","authors":"Tihana Galinac Grbac, P. Runeson, D. Huljenic","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2017.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The effects of different practices on fault distributions in evolving complex software systems is not fully understood. Software reuse and unit verification are practices used to improve system reliability by minimising the number of late faults. Reused software benefits from already being verified while unit verification aims to find faults early.Aims. We want to study effects of software reuse and unit verification on future modifications, fault densities of software units, and fault distributions.Method. We applied statistical analysis to a sample of 520 units that were reused and modified within four sequential projects from one product line in the telecommunication domain.Results. In reused units, the results of unit verification are correlated to a smaller degree of modifications and decreased fault densities.Conclusion. Unit verification in complex systems may improve system evolution in terms of smaller modifications and decrease of fault densities. The unit verification faults in reused components may be used as predictors of component modification and fault density.","PeriodicalId":151513,"journal":{"name":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unit Verification Effects on Reused Components in Sequential Project Releases\",\"authors\":\"Tihana Galinac Grbac, P. Runeson, D. Huljenic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA.2017.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The effects of different practices on fault distributions in evolving complex software systems is not fully understood. Software reuse and unit verification are practices used to improve system reliability by minimising the number of late faults. Reused software benefits from already being verified while unit verification aims to find faults early.Aims. We want to study effects of software reuse and unit verification on future modifications, fault densities of software units, and fault distributions.Method. We applied statistical analysis to a sample of 520 units that were reused and modified within four sequential projects from one product line in the telecommunication domain.Results. In reused units, the results of unit verification are correlated to a smaller degree of modifications and decreased fault densities.Conclusion. Unit verification in complex systems may improve system evolution in terms of smaller modifications and decrease of fault densities. The unit verification faults in reused components may be used as predictors of component modification and fault density.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。在不断发展的复杂软件系统中,不同实践对故障分布的影响还没有被完全理解。软件重用和单元验证是通过最小化后期故障数量来提高系统可靠性的实践。重用的软件从已经被验证中获益,而单元验证的目的是尽早发现错误。我们想研究软件重用和单元验证对未来修改、软件单元的故障密度和故障分布的影响。我们对520个单元的样本进行了统计分析,这些单元在电信领域的一条产品线的四个连续项目中被重用和修改。在重用单元中,单元验证的结果与较小程度的修改和降低的故障密度相关。复杂系统中的单元验证可以通过更小的修改和减少故障密度来改善系统的演化。重用组件中的单元验证错误可以作为组件修改和故障密度的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unit Verification Effects on Reused Components in Sequential Project Releases
Background. The effects of different practices on fault distributions in evolving complex software systems is not fully understood. Software reuse and unit verification are practices used to improve system reliability by minimising the number of late faults. Reused software benefits from already being verified while unit verification aims to find faults early.Aims. We want to study effects of software reuse and unit verification on future modifications, fault densities of software units, and fault distributions.Method. We applied statistical analysis to a sample of 520 units that were reused and modified within four sequential projects from one product line in the telecommunication domain.Results. In reused units, the results of unit verification are correlated to a smaller degree of modifications and decreased fault densities.Conclusion. Unit verification in complex systems may improve system evolution in terms of smaller modifications and decrease of fault densities. The unit verification faults in reused components may be used as predictors of component modification and fault density.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信