{"title":"新闻业的政策思辨与典范转移:新闻业危机该救吗?怎么救?","authors":"羅世宏 羅世宏","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 合而觀之，朱莉亞.卡熱和瑪莎.米諾的這兩本書都值得細讀，分別從經濟學和法學的角度論證了媒體政策變革的必要性與迫切性，也都不約而同地在書名中強調了「拯救」(saving)一詞，不只論證 新聞業值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒體(media)與救新聞(news)的具體建議。從她們的書中，新聞業政策思辨逐漸清晰，典範轉移呼之欲出，代表著歐陸與北美學術界關於新聞業前途的重要立論，非常值得台灣本地關心新聞與民主前景的人參考，並且用以思考綢繆本地新聞業危機的改革策略與主張。\n These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.\n \n","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"新聞業的政策思辨與典範轉移:新聞業危機該救嗎?怎麼救?\",\"authors\":\"羅世宏 羅世宏\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/172635812022060041010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 合而觀之，朱莉亞.卡熱和瑪莎.米諾的這兩本書都值得細讀，分別從經濟學和法學的角度論證了媒體政策變革的必要性與迫切性，也都不約而同地在書名中強調了「拯救」(saving)一詞，不只論證 新聞業值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒體(media)與救新聞(news)的具體建議。從她們的書中，新聞業政策思辨逐漸清晰，典範轉移呼之欲出，代表著歐陸與北美學術界關於新聞業前途的重要立論，非常值得台灣本地關心新聞與民主前景的人參考，並且用以思考綢繆本地新聞業危機的改革策略與主張。\\n These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":377163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中華傳播學刊\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中華傳播學刊\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中華傳播學刊","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
合而观之，朱莉亚.卡热和玛莎.米诺的这两本书都值得细读，分别从经济学和法学的角度论证了媒体政策变革的必要性与迫切性，也都不约而同地在书名中强调了「拯救」(saving)一词，不只论证 新闻业值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒体(media)与救新闻(news)的具体建议。从她们的书中，新闻业政策思辨逐渐清晰，典范转移呼之欲出，代表著欧陆与北美学术界关于新闻业前途的重要立论，非常值得台湾本地关心新闻与民主前景的人参考，并且用以思考绸缪本地新闻业危机的改革策略与主张。 These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.
合而觀之，朱莉亞.卡熱和瑪莎.米諾的這兩本書都值得細讀，分別從經濟學和法學的角度論證了媒體政策變革的必要性與迫切性，也都不約而同地在書名中強調了「拯救」(saving)一詞，不只論證 新聞業值得救，也各自提出了如何救媒體(media)與救新聞(news)的具體建議。從她們的書中，新聞業政策思辨逐漸清晰，典範轉移呼之欲出，代表著歐陸與北美學術界關於新聞業前途的重要立論，非常值得台灣本地關心新聞與民主前景的人參考，並且用以思考綢繆本地新聞業危機的改革策略與主張。
These two books, Saving the Media and Saving the News, written by Julia Cagé in 2015 and Martha Minow in 2021, are worth reading. Cagé and Minow demonstrate the urgency of media policy reform from the perspectives of economics and law respectively. They emphasize the word “saving” to indicate that journalism is worth saving and to propose suggestions on how to save the media and the news. In their books, the imperative for a journalism policy is clarified, and a paradigm shift in thoughts about the future of journalism emerges. These authors voice a renewed concern for the future of journalism in European and North American academic circles, and this concern should be taken seriously. We are in urgent need of media reform strategies and solutions for overcoming the journalism crisis in Taiwan.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
