制药业的法律和政治竞争力

Marcus Oehlrich, A. Daemmrich
{"title":"制药业的法律和政治竞争力","authors":"Marcus Oehlrich, A. Daemmrich","doi":"10.3233/PPL-130370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pharmaceutical industry operates both as an important business sector and a vital contributor to the delivery of health services worldwide. In 2012, the total world market for pharmaceutical products amounted to nearly US$1 trillion (see Table 1). Although global in scope, some 60 percent of sales were in North America and Europe, which comprise only 15 percent of the world’s population. The industry plays an important economic role in many countries by contributing to national income and employing hundreds of thousands of educated workers. Studies in the United States and Germany have found that for each direct employee, the pharmaceutical industry also generates between 1.6 and 3.5 jobs in supporting industries [7, 9]. While Germany long boasted of its role as the “world’s apothecary,” firms in Switzerland, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States also have underwritten decades of research into new medicines and brought several thousand new medicines to market since the late 19th century [1]. However, since the early 2000s, a steady decline in global prescription drug sales has accompanied an international deterioration in the underlying conditions critical to pharmaceutical in novation [6]. Troubles can be found also in a declining number of new chemical or biological medicines approved for markets despite a steady rise in research spending [8]. Policy discussions in some countries reveal a shift against industry arguments that high profit margins on current drug sales are necessary to finance research into future pharmaceuticals. Countries across the OECD instead are looking for ways to reduce health spending and national pharmaceutical budgets have been held constant or even reduced. Policies including reference pricing and demands that the industry demonstrate the cost effectiveness of its products are now widespread, especially in Europe [4]. Articles in this special issue of Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law analyse factors governing the legal and competitive environment for the pharmaceutical sector. Key issues are explored across the full pharmaceutical value chain, including drug discovery, development, authorization, and marketing. The articles demonstrate widespread, typically longstanding, tensions between policies that on the one hand","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal and Political Competitiveness for Pharmaceuticals\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Oehlrich, A. Daemmrich\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/PPL-130370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pharmaceutical industry operates both as an important business sector and a vital contributor to the delivery of health services worldwide. In 2012, the total world market for pharmaceutical products amounted to nearly US$1 trillion (see Table 1). Although global in scope, some 60 percent of sales were in North America and Europe, which comprise only 15 percent of the world’s population. The industry plays an important economic role in many countries by contributing to national income and employing hundreds of thousands of educated workers. Studies in the United States and Germany have found that for each direct employee, the pharmaceutical industry also generates between 1.6 and 3.5 jobs in supporting industries [7, 9]. While Germany long boasted of its role as the “world’s apothecary,” firms in Switzerland, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States also have underwritten decades of research into new medicines and brought several thousand new medicines to market since the late 19th century [1]. However, since the early 2000s, a steady decline in global prescription drug sales has accompanied an international deterioration in the underlying conditions critical to pharmaceutical in novation [6]. Troubles can be found also in a declining number of new chemical or biological medicines approved for markets despite a steady rise in research spending [8]. Policy discussions in some countries reveal a shift against industry arguments that high profit margins on current drug sales are necessary to finance research into future pharmaceuticals. Countries across the OECD instead are looking for ways to reduce health spending and national pharmaceutical budgets have been held constant or even reduced. Policies including reference pricing and demands that the industry demonstrate the cost effectiveness of its products are now widespread, especially in Europe [4]. Articles in this special issue of Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law analyse factors governing the legal and competitive environment for the pharmaceutical sector. Key issues are explored across the full pharmaceutical value chain, including drug discovery, development, authorization, and marketing. The articles demonstrate widespread, typically longstanding, tensions between policies that on the one hand\",\"PeriodicalId\":348240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-130370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-130370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制药业既是一个重要的商业部门,也是全世界提供保健服务的重要贡献者。2012年,世界医药产品市场总额接近1万亿美元(见表1)。尽管范围遍及全球,但约60%的销售额来自北美和欧洲,而这两个地区的人口仅占世界人口的15%。该行业通过贡献国民收入和雇用数十万受过教育的工人,在许多国家发挥着重要的经济作用。美国和德国的研究发现,对于每一个直接雇员,制药行业还会在配套产业中产生1.6 - 3.5个工作岗位[7,9]。虽然德国长期以来一直吹嘘自己是“世界药剂师”,但自19世纪末以来,瑞士、法国、英国和美国的制药公司也资助了数十年的新药研究,并将数千种新药推向市场[1]。然而,自21世纪初以来,全球处方药销售的稳步下降伴随着对制药创新至关重要的基本条件的国际恶化[6]。尽管研究支出稳步上升,但获准上市的新化学或生物药物数量却在不断减少[8]。一些国家的政策讨论表明,业界的观点出现了转变,即当前药品销售的高利润率对于资助未来药品的研究是必要的。相反,经合组织各国正在寻找减少卫生支出的方法,国家药品预算一直保持不变,甚至有所减少。包括参考定价和要求行业证明其产品的成本效益在内的政策现在很普遍,特别是在欧洲[4]。本期《药品政策与法律》特刊的文章分析了制约制药部门法律和竞争环境的因素。在整个制药价值链中探讨关键问题,包括药物发现、开发、授权和营销。这些文章展示了政策之间普遍存在的、通常是长期存在的紧张关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal and Political Competitiveness for Pharmaceuticals
The pharmaceutical industry operates both as an important business sector and a vital contributor to the delivery of health services worldwide. In 2012, the total world market for pharmaceutical products amounted to nearly US$1 trillion (see Table 1). Although global in scope, some 60 percent of sales were in North America and Europe, which comprise only 15 percent of the world’s population. The industry plays an important economic role in many countries by contributing to national income and employing hundreds of thousands of educated workers. Studies in the United States and Germany have found that for each direct employee, the pharmaceutical industry also generates between 1.6 and 3.5 jobs in supporting industries [7, 9]. While Germany long boasted of its role as the “world’s apothecary,” firms in Switzerland, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States also have underwritten decades of research into new medicines and brought several thousand new medicines to market since the late 19th century [1]. However, since the early 2000s, a steady decline in global prescription drug sales has accompanied an international deterioration in the underlying conditions critical to pharmaceutical in novation [6]. Troubles can be found also in a declining number of new chemical or biological medicines approved for markets despite a steady rise in research spending [8]. Policy discussions in some countries reveal a shift against industry arguments that high profit margins on current drug sales are necessary to finance research into future pharmaceuticals. Countries across the OECD instead are looking for ways to reduce health spending and national pharmaceutical budgets have been held constant or even reduced. Policies including reference pricing and demands that the industry demonstrate the cost effectiveness of its products are now widespread, especially in Europe [4]. Articles in this special issue of Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law analyse factors governing the legal and competitive environment for the pharmaceutical sector. Key issues are explored across the full pharmaceutical value chain, including drug discovery, development, authorization, and marketing. The articles demonstrate widespread, typically longstanding, tensions between policies that on the one hand
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信