隐私和营销外部性:来自“不要打电话”的证据

K. Goh, K. Hui, I. Png
{"title":"隐私和营销外部性:来自“不要打电话”的证据","authors":"K. Goh, K. Hui, I. Png","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1908495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If not well targeted, advertising and direct marketing inflict nuisance and inconvenience on consumers. Theoretical analyses predict that consumer actions to avoid advertising impose externalities on other consumers. We investigate the extent of such externalities in the context of the U.S. Do Not Call (DNC) registry by exploiting the exogenous timing of the enforcement of the registry. Supported by multiple robustness tests, and validation and falsification exercises, we conclude that consumer DNC registrations imposed externalities on other consumers. An increase in the first wave of registrations by 1% was associated with a 3.1% increase in subsequent registrations. This effect was stronger in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets. The externality was possibly due to unregistered consumers being more receptive to telemarketing and telemarketers increasing calls to them. Our results suggest that managers should facilitate consumer opt-out, especially in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2051 . This paper was accepted by J. Miguel Villas-Boas, marketing .","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy and Marketing Externalities: Evidence from Do Not Call\",\"authors\":\"K. Goh, K. Hui, I. Png\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1908495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If not well targeted, advertising and direct marketing inflict nuisance and inconvenience on consumers. Theoretical analyses predict that consumer actions to avoid advertising impose externalities on other consumers. We investigate the extent of such externalities in the context of the U.S. Do Not Call (DNC) registry by exploiting the exogenous timing of the enforcement of the registry. Supported by multiple robustness tests, and validation and falsification exercises, we conclude that consumer DNC registrations imposed externalities on other consumers. An increase in the first wave of registrations by 1% was associated with a 3.1% increase in subsequent registrations. This effect was stronger in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets. The externality was possibly due to unregistered consumers being more receptive to telemarketing and telemarketers increasing calls to them. Our results suggest that managers should facilitate consumer opt-out, especially in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2051 . This paper was accepted by J. Miguel Villas-Boas, marketing .\",\"PeriodicalId\":443127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Marketing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Marketing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1908495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1908495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

如果没有明确的目标,广告和直接营销会给消费者带来麻烦和不便。理论分析预测,消费者为避免广告而采取的行动会给其他消费者带来外部性。我们通过利用登记处执行的外生时间,在美国不打电话(DNC)登记处的背景下调查这种外部性的程度。在多次稳健性测试以及验证和证伪练习的支持下,我们得出结论,消费者DNC注册对其他消费者施加了外部性。第一波注册人数增加1%与随后注册人数增加3.1%相关。这种效应在规模更大、教育程度或种族差异更大的市场中更为明显。外部性可能是由于未登记的消费者更容易接受电话营销和电话营销人员越来越多地打电话给他们。我们的研究结果表明,管理者应该促进消费者选择退出,尤其是在更大、教育程度或种族差异更大的市场中。作为补充资料的数据可在http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2051上获得。这篇论文被市场营销学的J. Miguel Villas-Boas接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy and Marketing Externalities: Evidence from Do Not Call
If not well targeted, advertising and direct marketing inflict nuisance and inconvenience on consumers. Theoretical analyses predict that consumer actions to avoid advertising impose externalities on other consumers. We investigate the extent of such externalities in the context of the U.S. Do Not Call (DNC) registry by exploiting the exogenous timing of the enforcement of the registry. Supported by multiple robustness tests, and validation and falsification exercises, we conclude that consumer DNC registrations imposed externalities on other consumers. An increase in the first wave of registrations by 1% was associated with a 3.1% increase in subsequent registrations. This effect was stronger in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets. The externality was possibly due to unregistered consumers being more receptive to telemarketing and telemarketers increasing calls to them. Our results suggest that managers should facilitate consumer opt-out, especially in larger and more educationally or racially heterogeneous markets.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2051 . This paper was accepted by J. Miguel Villas-Boas, marketing .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信