音乐和弦标签评价的三个指标

Andrew Mcleod, Xavier Suermondt, Yannis Rammos, S. Herff, M. Rohrmeier
{"title":"音乐和弦标签评价的三个指标","authors":"Andrew Mcleod, Xavier Suermondt, Yannis Rammos, S. Herff, M. Rohrmeier","doi":"10.1145/3574318.3574335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harmony constitutes an essential aspect of a broad range of styles in Western music, and chords usually play a key role therein. Consequently, the generation or detection of chords is central to a wide range of computational models, for instance in chord estimation, chord sequence prediction, and harmonic structure detection. Such models are typically evaluated by comparing their outputs to ground-truth chord labels using a binary metric (“correct” or “incorrect”). As chord vocabularies continue to grow, binary metrics capture less information about the correctness of a given label, thus equating all labeling errors regardless of their severity. In this work, we present the chord-eval toolkit, which proposes three different metrics drawn, adapted, and generalized from previous work, addressing acoustic, perceptual, music-theoretical, and mechanical aspects of evaluation. We discuss use cases for which the metrics vary in appropriateness, depending on properties of the underlying music and the task at hand, and present an example of such differences.","PeriodicalId":270700,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Metrics for Musical Chord Label Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Mcleod, Xavier Suermondt, Yannis Rammos, S. Herff, M. Rohrmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3574318.3574335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Harmony constitutes an essential aspect of a broad range of styles in Western music, and chords usually play a key role therein. Consequently, the generation or detection of chords is central to a wide range of computational models, for instance in chord estimation, chord sequence prediction, and harmonic structure detection. Such models are typically evaluated by comparing their outputs to ground-truth chord labels using a binary metric (“correct” or “incorrect”). As chord vocabularies continue to grow, binary metrics capture less information about the correctness of a given label, thus equating all labeling errors regardless of their severity. In this work, we present the chord-eval toolkit, which proposes three different metrics drawn, adapted, and generalized from previous work, addressing acoustic, perceptual, music-theoretical, and mechanical aspects of evaluation. We discuss use cases for which the metrics vary in appropriateness, depending on properties of the underlying music and the task at hand, and present an example of such differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3574318.3574335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3574318.3574335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

和谐构成了西方音乐风格的一个基本方面,而和弦通常在其中起着关键作用。因此,和弦的生成或检测是广泛计算模型的核心,例如在和弦估计,和弦序列预测和谐波结构检测中。这种模型通常通过使用二元度量(“正确”或“不正确”)将其输出与真值和弦标签进行比较来评估。随着和弦词汇表的不断增长,二进制指标捕获的关于给定标签正确性的信息越来越少,因此等于所有标签错误,无论其严重程度如何。在这项工作中,我们提出了和弦评估工具包,它提出了三个不同的指标,从以前的工作中绘制,改编和概括,解决声学,感知,音乐理论和机械方面的评估。我们讨论了一些用例,这些用例的度量标准在适当性上有所不同,这取决于底层音乐的属性和手头的任务,并给出了一个这种差异的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three Metrics for Musical Chord Label Evaluation
Harmony constitutes an essential aspect of a broad range of styles in Western music, and chords usually play a key role therein. Consequently, the generation or detection of chords is central to a wide range of computational models, for instance in chord estimation, chord sequence prediction, and harmonic structure detection. Such models are typically evaluated by comparing their outputs to ground-truth chord labels using a binary metric (“correct” or “incorrect”). As chord vocabularies continue to grow, binary metrics capture less information about the correctness of a given label, thus equating all labeling errors regardless of their severity. In this work, we present the chord-eval toolkit, which proposes three different metrics drawn, adapted, and generalized from previous work, addressing acoustic, perceptual, music-theoretical, and mechanical aspects of evaluation. We discuss use cases for which the metrics vary in appropriateness, depending on properties of the underlying music and the task at hand, and present an example of such differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信