为未来的复杂任务学习

Ingrid Christine Reite, Sverre Dag Mogstad
{"title":"为未来的复杂任务学习","authors":"Ingrid Christine Reite, Sverre Dag Mogstad","doi":"10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we forefront and analyse different approaches to learning in higher theological education. In a society of increasing pluralization and democratization, the knowledge base of theology is in change. A constitutive feature of the expertise of future clergy may be simply to learn. In this article we examine the conditions for learning in the curricula of higher theological education. Learning is here not studied as an outcome of education. Here we study the conditions for learning created by how content, methods/tools and relations are combined in the curriculum. The material of this analysis is curriculum texts from the education of Protestant pastors at the MF Norwegian School of Theology (MF) and from the Protestantse Theologische Universiteit (PThU) in the Netherlands. The findings show that the two countries emphasize different learning approaches, and that the two curricula in differing degrees are oriented towards acquiring and creating new knowledge. We argue that the learning approaches in theological higher education establish quite different conditions and trajectories for how future pastors learn and handle knowledge. These learning trajectories can affect core activities of future pastors, which is to theologize.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning for Future Complex Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Christine Reite, Sverre Dag Mogstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, we forefront and analyse different approaches to learning in higher theological education. In a society of increasing pluralization and democratization, the knowledge base of theology is in change. A constitutive feature of the expertise of future clergy may be simply to learn. In this article we examine the conditions for learning in the curricula of higher theological education. Learning is here not studied as an outcome of education. Here we study the conditions for learning created by how content, methods/tools and relations are combined in the curriculum. The material of this analysis is curriculum texts from the education of Protestant pastors at the MF Norwegian School of Theology (MF) and from the Protestantse Theologische Universiteit (PThU) in the Netherlands. The findings show that the two countries emphasize different learning approaches, and that the two curricula in differing degrees are oriented towards acquiring and creating new knowledge. We argue that the learning approaches in theological higher education establish quite different conditions and trajectories for how future pastors learn and handle knowledge. These learning trajectories can affect core activities of future pastors, which is to theologize.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adult Theological Education\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adult Theological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文对高等神学教育中不同的学习方式进行了梳理和分析。在一个日益多元化和民主化的社会中,神学的知识基础正在发生变化。未来神职人员专业知识的一个基本特征可能就是学习。本文对高等神学教育课程中的学习条件进行了探讨。在这里,学习不是作为教育的结果来研究的。在这里,我们研究如何在课程中结合内容、方法/工具和关系所创造的学习条件。本分析的材料是来自MF挪威神学学院(MF)和荷兰新教神学大学(PThU)新教牧师教育的课程文本。研究结果表明,两国强调不同的学习方法,两种课程在不同程度上都以获取和创造新知识为导向。我们认为,神学高等教育的学习方式为未来牧师如何学习和处理知识建立了完全不同的条件和轨迹。这些学习轨迹会影响未来牧师的核心活动,即神学化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning for Future Complex Tasks
Abstract In this article, we forefront and analyse different approaches to learning in higher theological education. In a society of increasing pluralization and democratization, the knowledge base of theology is in change. A constitutive feature of the expertise of future clergy may be simply to learn. In this article we examine the conditions for learning in the curricula of higher theological education. Learning is here not studied as an outcome of education. Here we study the conditions for learning created by how content, methods/tools and relations are combined in the curriculum. The material of this analysis is curriculum texts from the education of Protestant pastors at the MF Norwegian School of Theology (MF) and from the Protestantse Theologische Universiteit (PThU) in the Netherlands. The findings show that the two countries emphasize different learning approaches, and that the two curricula in differing degrees are oriented towards acquiring and creating new knowledge. We argue that the learning approaches in theological higher education establish quite different conditions and trajectories for how future pastors learn and handle knowledge. These learning trajectories can affect core activities of future pastors, which is to theologize.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信