人工智能伦理:原则与挑战的系统文献综述

A. Khan, Sher Badshah, Peng Liang, Bilal Khan, M. Waseem, M. Niazi, M. Akbar
{"title":"人工智能伦理:原则与挑战的系统文献综述","authors":"A. Khan, Sher Badshah, Peng Liang, Bilal Khan, M. Waseem, M. Niazi, M. Akbar","doi":"10.1145/3530019.3531329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethics in AI becomes a global topic of interest for both policymakers and academic researchers. In the last few years, various research organizations, lawyers, think tankers, and regulatory bodies get involved in developing AI ethics guidelines and principles. However, there is still debate about the implications of these principles. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) study to investigate the agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify the challenging factors that could negatively impact the adoption of AI ethics principles. The results reveal that the global convergence set consists of 22 ethical principles and 15 challenges. Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles. Similarly, lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI. The findings of this study are the preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assesses the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provides best practices for further improvements.","PeriodicalId":441194,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"A. Khan, Sher Badshah, Peng Liang, Bilal Khan, M. Waseem, M. Niazi, M. Akbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3530019.3531329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethics in AI becomes a global topic of interest for both policymakers and academic researchers. In the last few years, various research organizations, lawyers, think tankers, and regulatory bodies get involved in developing AI ethics guidelines and principles. However, there is still debate about the implications of these principles. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) study to investigate the agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify the challenging factors that could negatively impact the adoption of AI ethics principles. The results reveal that the global convergence set consists of 22 ethical principles and 15 challenges. Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles. Similarly, lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI. The findings of this study are the preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assesses the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provides best practices for further improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3531329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3531329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

人工智能伦理已成为政策制定者和学术研究人员感兴趣的全球话题。在过去的几年里,各种研究机构、律师、智库和监管机构都参与了人工智能伦理准则和原则的制定。然而,关于这些原则的含义仍然存在争议。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述(SLR)研究,以调查对人工智能原则重要性的共识,并确定可能对人工智能伦理原则的采用产生负面影响的挑战性因素。结果表明,全局收敛集由22个伦理原则和15个挑战组成。透明、隐私、问责和公平被认为是最常见的人工智能伦理原则。同样,缺乏伦理知识和模糊的原则被认为是考虑人工智能伦理的重大挑战。本研究的结果是提出成熟度模型的初步输入,该模型评估人工智能系统的道德能力,并为进一步改进提供最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges
Ethics in AI becomes a global topic of interest for both policymakers and academic researchers. In the last few years, various research organizations, lawyers, think tankers, and regulatory bodies get involved in developing AI ethics guidelines and principles. However, there is still debate about the implications of these principles. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) study to investigate the agreement on the significance of AI principles and identify the challenging factors that could negatively impact the adoption of AI ethics principles. The results reveal that the global convergence set consists of 22 ethical principles and 15 challenges. Transparency, privacy, accountability and fairness are identified as the most common AI ethics principles. Similarly, lack of ethical knowledge and vague principles are reported as the significant challenges for considering ethics in AI. The findings of this study are the preliminary inputs for proposing a maturity model that assesses the ethical capabilities of AI systems and provides best practices for further improvements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信