Gang-Seok Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak, Ji-Man Park, Jinsoo Ahn, D. Seo
{"title":"用三维分析方法比较研磨丙烯酸树脂和氧化锆三单元桥模型的再现性","authors":"Gang-Seok Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak, Ji-Man Park, Jinsoo Ahn, D. Seo","doi":"10.32542/implantology.20180011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of milled acrylic resin and zirconia models using three-dimensional analysis. Material and Methods: Zirconia discs and acrylic resin blocks were milled to make models. Each model was scanned with a model scanner. The zirconia models were superimposed with other zirconia model, and the acrylic resin models were superimposed with other acrylic resin model threedimensionally. Root-mean-square (RMS) values were obtained. Distances between two superimposed models were measured. Statistical significances were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and t-test. Results: The RMS values of the zirconia model and the acrylic resin model were not significantly different (p≥0.05). At the premolar site, distances between the zirconia models at the upper axial and at the lower axial wall were significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). At the molar site, distance between the zirconia models at the lower axial wall was significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although there is a difference in reproducibility between the milled acrylic resin model and the zirconia model in the localized region, no significant difference was found in the whole model.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Reproducibility of Milled Acrylic Resin and Zirconia Models for 3-unit bridge Using Three-dimensional Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gang-Seok Park, Seong-Kyun Kim, S. Heo, J. Koak, Ji-Man Park, Jinsoo Ahn, D. Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.32542/implantology.20180011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of milled acrylic resin and zirconia models using three-dimensional analysis. Material and Methods: Zirconia discs and acrylic resin blocks were milled to make models. Each model was scanned with a model scanner. The zirconia models were superimposed with other zirconia model, and the acrylic resin models were superimposed with other acrylic resin model threedimensionally. Root-mean-square (RMS) values were obtained. Distances between two superimposed models were measured. Statistical significances were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and t-test. Results: The RMS values of the zirconia model and the acrylic resin model were not significantly different (p≥0.05). At the premolar site, distances between the zirconia models at the upper axial and at the lower axial wall were significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). At the molar site, distance between the zirconia models at the lower axial wall was significantly smaller than for the acrylic resin models (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although there is a difference in reproducibility between the milled acrylic resin model and the zirconia model in the localized region, no significant difference was found in the whole model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0