重新审视“桥接还是绑定”:社会资本与即时通讯(IM)和博客的使用

Hong-Chi Shiau
{"title":"重新审视“桥接还是绑定”:社会资本与即时通讯(IM)和博客的使用","authors":"Hong-Chi Shiau","doi":"10.1504/IJED.2008.021279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates two popular internet uses: Instant Messenger (IM) and web blogs, of which many functions were enabled by the advanced technologies. The results revealed that users in IM network are more likely to bond, whereas users in web blog network are more likely to bridge. The time spent on IM network is a strong and valid predisposition factor for bonding social capital. However, it is against prediction that the bonding or bridging social capital is not related with the size of a network.","PeriodicalId":141497,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronic Democracy","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting 'bridging or binding': social capital and the uses of Instant Messenger (IM) and blog\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Chi Shiau\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJED.2008.021279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates two popular internet uses: Instant Messenger (IM) and web blogs, of which many functions were enabled by the advanced technologies. The results revealed that users in IM network are more likely to bond, whereas users in web blog network are more likely to bridge. The time spent on IM network is a strong and valid predisposition factor for bonding social capital. However, it is against prediction that the bonding or bridging social capital is not related with the size of a network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electronic Democracy\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electronic Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJED.2008.021279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronic Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJED.2008.021279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究调查了两种流行的互联网用途:即时通讯(IM)和网络博客,其中许多功能是由先进的技术实现的。结果显示,即时通讯网络的用户更倾向于建立联系,而网页博客网络的用户更倾向于建立桥梁。在即时通讯网络上花费的时间是建立社会资本的一个强大而有效的倾向因素。然而,与预测相反,连接或桥接社会资本与网络规模无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting 'bridging or binding': social capital and the uses of Instant Messenger (IM) and blog
This study investigates two popular internet uses: Instant Messenger (IM) and web blogs, of which many functions were enabled by the advanced technologies. The results revealed that users in IM network are more likely to bond, whereas users in web blog network are more likely to bridge. The time spent on IM network is a strong and valid predisposition factor for bonding social capital. However, it is against prediction that the bonding or bridging social capital is not related with the size of a network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信