{"title":"论购买力平价的功能形式:以9个新欧盟国家为例","authors":"Y. Hsing","doi":"10.1080/17446540701765225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article applies the extended Box–Cox model to test functional forms of purchasing power parity (PPP) for nine new EU countries. It finds that the widely used double-log form for PPP can be rejected for eight countries except for the Czech Republic and that the unitary elasticity can be rejected for eight countries except for Slovenia. Hence, most countries have a nonlinear functional form of PPP and exhibit a nonunitary elasticity.","PeriodicalId":345744,"journal":{"name":"Applied Financial Economics Letters","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the functional form of PPP: the case of nine new EU countries\",\"authors\":\"Y. Hsing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17446540701765225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article applies the extended Box–Cox model to test functional forms of purchasing power parity (PPP) for nine new EU countries. It finds that the widely used double-log form for PPP can be rejected for eight countries except for the Czech Republic and that the unitary elasticity can be rejected for eight countries except for Slovenia. Hence, most countries have a nonlinear functional form of PPP and exhibit a nonunitary elasticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Financial Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Financial Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540701765225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Financial Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540701765225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the functional form of PPP: the case of nine new EU countries
This article applies the extended Box–Cox model to test functional forms of purchasing power parity (PPP) for nine new EU countries. It finds that the widely used double-log form for PPP can be rejected for eight countries except for the Czech Republic and that the unitary elasticity can be rejected for eight countries except for Slovenia. Hence, most countries have a nonlinear functional form of PPP and exhibit a nonunitary elasticity.