克莱沃的《自由裁量权》中的权威与创新

M. Colish
{"title":"克莱沃的《自由裁量权》中的权威与创新","authors":"M. Colish","doi":"10.5117/9789462985933_ch03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twelfth-century scholastics are renowned for their willingness to reassess\n and to criticize patristic authorities, with monastic authors typically\n understood as far more conservative in this regard. Bernard’s treatise\n revises that view. It reflects Bernard’s willingness to depart sharply from\n the late Augustine on grace and free will and to invoke a patristic-age\n monastic authority, John Cassian, in so doing. Bernard’s own position,\n accenting the liberty of our postlapsarian free will and its full collaboration\n with divine grace, displays both his uses of, and departures from, these\n two authorities.","PeriodicalId":403884,"journal":{"name":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authority and Innovation in Bernard of Clairvaux ’s De gratia et libero arbitrio\",\"authors\":\"M. Colish\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789462985933_ch03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Twelfth-century scholastics are renowned for their willingness to reassess\\n and to criticize patristic authorities, with monastic authors typically\\n understood as far more conservative in this regard. Bernard’s treatise\\n revises that view. It reflects Bernard’s willingness to depart sharply from\\n the late Augustine on grace and free will and to invoke a patristic-age\\n monastic authority, John Cassian, in so doing. Bernard’s own position,\\n accenting the liberty of our postlapsarian free will and its full collaboration\\n with divine grace, displays both his uses of, and departures from, these\\n two authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985933_ch03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985933_ch03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

12世纪的经院学者以他们愿意重新评估和批评教父权威而闻名,而在这方面,修道院作者通常被认为要保守得多。伯纳德的论文修正了这一观点。这反映了伯纳德在恩典和自由意志方面与奥古斯丁截然不同的意愿,并在此过程中援引了教父时代的修道院权威,约翰·卡西安。伯纳德自己的立场,强调了我们堕落后的自由意志的自由及其与神圣恩典的充分合作,显示了他对这两种权威的使用和背离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authority and Innovation in Bernard of Clairvaux ’s De gratia et libero arbitrio
Twelfth-century scholastics are renowned for their willingness to reassess and to criticize patristic authorities, with monastic authors typically understood as far more conservative in this regard. Bernard’s treatise revises that view. It reflects Bernard’s willingness to depart sharply from the late Augustine on grace and free will and to invoke a patristic-age monastic authority, John Cassian, in so doing. Bernard’s own position, accenting the liberty of our postlapsarian free will and its full collaboration with divine grace, displays both his uses of, and departures from, these two authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信