不同年龄组个体的生活价值观和孤独经历的独特性

L. Kolesnichenko
{"title":"不同年龄组个体的生活价值观和孤独经历的独特性","authors":"L. Kolesnichenko","doi":"10.37096/shdisj-21-1.1-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the dominant life values and peculiarities of loneliness experiences in individuals of different age groups in adolescence and adulthood. The sample consisted of two groups. The first comprises 30 people aged 18 to 25, 15 - females and 15 - males. The second group comprises 30 people aged 40 to 50 years, 15 - females and 15 - males. Due to quarantine restrictions one-week study was conducted online using Google Drive.\nResearch methods used in this article are as follows: \"Differential questionnaire of loneliness\" by E.M. Osina and D.O. Leontieva to determine the level of loneliness, which includes the acceptance of this loneliness, positive loneliness and dependence on communication; methodology \"Diagnosis of the level of subjective feeling of loneliness\" by D. Russell, L. Popel, M. Ferguson in the adaptation of N.E. Vodopyanova to determine the level of negative loneliness; methodology \"Value Questionnaire\" by S.H. Schwartz to study the life values of the individual.\nThe study found that young people are dominated by the values of independence in thoughts, openness to change, independence in behavior in contrast to adults, who are dominated by the values of self-transcendence, openness to change, motives of hedonism in behavior. An important vital value for both age groups was openness to change, which, we can assume, is not related to age. It was also determined that the highest level of loneliness and positive loneliness is observed in respondents aged 18 to 25 years, in contrast to the subjects aged 40-50.\nThe studied theoretical and practical aspects of the connection between experiencing loneliness and life values of the individual made it clear that certain life values have a close direct or inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness, namely with the values of hedonism, self-aggrandizement in behavior, independence in behavior and also have a direct significant relation to the feeling of loneliness, while the motives of kindness, security and self-transcendence in behavior have a significant inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness.\nThe prospects for the research in this area are quite large, but we have identified a way for the further research, which involves comparing our data with the fact whether the subject has a family or not.","PeriodicalId":149585,"journal":{"name":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PECULIARITIES OF LIFE VALUES AND EXPERIENCES OF LONELINESS IN INDIVIDUALS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS\",\"authors\":\"L. Kolesnichenko\",\"doi\":\"10.37096/shdisj-21-1.1-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of the dominant life values and peculiarities of loneliness experiences in individuals of different age groups in adolescence and adulthood. The sample consisted of two groups. The first comprises 30 people aged 18 to 25, 15 - females and 15 - males. The second group comprises 30 people aged 40 to 50 years, 15 - females and 15 - males. Due to quarantine restrictions one-week study was conducted online using Google Drive.\\nResearch methods used in this article are as follows: \\\"Differential questionnaire of loneliness\\\" by E.M. Osina and D.O. Leontieva to determine the level of loneliness, which includes the acceptance of this loneliness, positive loneliness and dependence on communication; methodology \\\"Diagnosis of the level of subjective feeling of loneliness\\\" by D. Russell, L. Popel, M. Ferguson in the adaptation of N.E. Vodopyanova to determine the level of negative loneliness; methodology \\\"Value Questionnaire\\\" by S.H. Schwartz to study the life values of the individual.\\nThe study found that young people are dominated by the values of independence in thoughts, openness to change, independence in behavior in contrast to adults, who are dominated by the values of self-transcendence, openness to change, motives of hedonism in behavior. An important vital value for both age groups was openness to change, which, we can assume, is not related to age. It was also determined that the highest level of loneliness and positive loneliness is observed in respondents aged 18 to 25 years, in contrast to the subjects aged 40-50.\\nThe studied theoretical and practical aspects of the connection between experiencing loneliness and life values of the individual made it clear that certain life values have a close direct or inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness, namely with the values of hedonism, self-aggrandizement in behavior, independence in behavior and also have a direct significant relation to the feeling of loneliness, while the motives of kindness, security and self-transcendence in behavior have a significant inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness.\\nThe prospects for the research in this area are quite large, but we have identified a way for the further research, which involves comparing our data with the fact whether the subject has a family or not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-21-1.1-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-21-1.1-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于研究青少年和成年期不同年龄段个体的主要生活价值观和孤独体验的特点。样本由两组组成。第一组由30名年龄在18至25岁之间的人组成,其中15名女性和15名男性。第二组包括30名年龄在40至50岁之间的人,其中15名女性和15名男性。由于隔离限制,使用Google Drive进行了为期一周的在线研究。本文采用的研究方法如下:E.M. Osina和D.O. Leontieva的“孤独感差异问卷”来确定孤独感的水平,包括对这种孤独感的接受程度、积极的孤独感和对交流的依赖程度;D. Russell、L. Popel、M. Ferguson在改编N.E. Vodopyanova确定消极孤独水平的方法论《主观孤独感水平的诊断》;施瓦兹的“价值问卷”研究个人的生命价值。研究发现,年轻人被思想独立、乐于改变、行为独立的价值观所主导,而成年人则被自我超越、乐于改变、行为享乐主义的价值观所主导。对这两个年龄段的人来说,一个至关重要的价值是对变化持开放态度,我们可以假设,这与年龄无关。研究还确定,与40-50岁的受访者相比,18至25岁的受访者中孤独和积极孤独的程度最高。从理论和实践两个方面研究了个体的孤独感与生活价值观之间的联系,表明某些生活价值观与孤独感有密切的直接或反向联系,即享乐主义价值观、行为上的自我强化价值观、行为上的独立价值观,也与孤独感有直接的显著关系,而善良的动机、行为上的安全感和自我超越与孤独感呈显著的负相关。这一领域的研究前景非常广阔,但我们已经确定了进一步研究的方法,这涉及到将我们的数据与受试者是否有家庭的事实进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PECULIARITIES OF LIFE VALUES AND EXPERIENCES OF LONELINESS IN INDIVIDUALS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS
The article is devoted to the study of the dominant life values and peculiarities of loneliness experiences in individuals of different age groups in adolescence and adulthood. The sample consisted of two groups. The first comprises 30 people aged 18 to 25, 15 - females and 15 - males. The second group comprises 30 people aged 40 to 50 years, 15 - females and 15 - males. Due to quarantine restrictions one-week study was conducted online using Google Drive. Research methods used in this article are as follows: "Differential questionnaire of loneliness" by E.M. Osina and D.O. Leontieva to determine the level of loneliness, which includes the acceptance of this loneliness, positive loneliness and dependence on communication; methodology "Diagnosis of the level of subjective feeling of loneliness" by D. Russell, L. Popel, M. Ferguson in the adaptation of N.E. Vodopyanova to determine the level of negative loneliness; methodology "Value Questionnaire" by S.H. Schwartz to study the life values of the individual. The study found that young people are dominated by the values of independence in thoughts, openness to change, independence in behavior in contrast to adults, who are dominated by the values of self-transcendence, openness to change, motives of hedonism in behavior. An important vital value for both age groups was openness to change, which, we can assume, is not related to age. It was also determined that the highest level of loneliness and positive loneliness is observed in respondents aged 18 to 25 years, in contrast to the subjects aged 40-50. The studied theoretical and practical aspects of the connection between experiencing loneliness and life values of the individual made it clear that certain life values have a close direct or inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness, namely with the values of hedonism, self-aggrandizement in behavior, independence in behavior and also have a direct significant relation to the feeling of loneliness, while the motives of kindness, security and self-transcendence in behavior have a significant inverse connection with the feeling of loneliness. The prospects for the research in this area are quite large, but we have identified a way for the further research, which involves comparing our data with the fact whether the subject has a family or not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信