对从孟加拉国帕图阿卡里Kuakata市场和干燥中心收集的干鱼质量进行比较评估

Mst. Niloy Jaman, Md. Sazedul Hoque, F. Yeasmin, M. Hasan, Md. Abu Sayed Ripon, A. Akter, Marium Akter Jhumur
{"title":"对从孟加拉国帕图阿卡里Kuakata市场和干燥中心收集的干鱼质量进行比较评估","authors":"Mst. Niloy Jaman, Md. Sazedul Hoque, F. Yeasmin, M. Hasan, Md. Abu Sayed Ripon, A. Akter, Marium Akter Jhumur","doi":"10.52168/bjf.2021.33.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study identified the quality differences of dried Chinese pomfret (Stromateus chinensis), Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) and ribbon fish (Trichiurus haumela) from market and drying center at Kuakata, Patuakhali. The sensory, nutritional and microbial quality of collected dried samples were evaluated following organoleptic quality index, standard AOAC and aerobic plate count methods, respectively. Organoleptically no significant difference found between the samples from market and drying center. The highest moisture content value was obtained in Bombay duck (29.78%) from the market and lowest value in Chinese pomfret (20.06%) from drying center. The highest and lowest protein content was in Chinese pomfret (60.73%) and Bombay duck (47.9%) from drying center and market, respectively. The lipid and ash content varied from 2.85% to 7.20% and 13.98% to 19.57% for all the dried fish species collected from both sites. Microbiologically, higher aerobic plate count (APC), total E. coli count (TEC) and total Salmonella count (TSC) were found in Chinese pomfret at 1.96×106 CFU/g, 3.98×105 CFU/g and 1.62×105 CFU/g from market and lowest count found in Bombay duck at 5.05×105, 2.22×105 and 0.81×105 from drying center, respectively. In ribbon fish no Salmonella sp. was found. Based on the sensory and nutritional quality the study conclude that among three species and two sites studied, the dried Bombay duck from the fish drying center had better quality characteristics than the counter parts. However, higher microbial load especially pathogenic TSC and TEC suggests to improve hygiene and sanitary practices, better market distribution and storage facilities need to be followed by the producers for safe and quality dried fishery products.","PeriodicalId":213044,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative assessment of dried fish quality collected from market and drying centre at Kuakata in Patuakhali, Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Mst. Niloy Jaman, Md. Sazedul Hoque, F. Yeasmin, M. Hasan, Md. Abu Sayed Ripon, A. Akter, Marium Akter Jhumur\",\"doi\":\"10.52168/bjf.2021.33.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study identified the quality differences of dried Chinese pomfret (Stromateus chinensis), Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) and ribbon fish (Trichiurus haumela) from market and drying center at Kuakata, Patuakhali. The sensory, nutritional and microbial quality of collected dried samples were evaluated following organoleptic quality index, standard AOAC and aerobic plate count methods, respectively. Organoleptically no significant difference found between the samples from market and drying center. The highest moisture content value was obtained in Bombay duck (29.78%) from the market and lowest value in Chinese pomfret (20.06%) from drying center. The highest and lowest protein content was in Chinese pomfret (60.73%) and Bombay duck (47.9%) from drying center and market, respectively. The lipid and ash content varied from 2.85% to 7.20% and 13.98% to 19.57% for all the dried fish species collected from both sites. Microbiologically, higher aerobic plate count (APC), total E. coli count (TEC) and total Salmonella count (TSC) were found in Chinese pomfret at 1.96×106 CFU/g, 3.98×105 CFU/g and 1.62×105 CFU/g from market and lowest count found in Bombay duck at 5.05×105, 2.22×105 and 0.81×105 from drying center, respectively. In ribbon fish no Salmonella sp. was found. Based on the sensory and nutritional quality the study conclude that among three species and two sites studied, the dried Bombay duck from the fish drying center had better quality characteristics than the counter parts. However, higher microbial load especially pathogenic TSC and TEC suggests to improve hygiene and sanitary practices, better market distribution and storage facilities need to be followed by the producers for safe and quality dried fishery products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52168/bjf.2021.33.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52168/bjf.2021.33.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对帕图阿卡利Kuakata市场和干燥中心的干鲳鱼(Stromateus chinensis)、干孟买鸭(Harpodon nehereus)和干带鱼(Trichiurus haumela)进行了质量鉴定。采用感官质量指数法、标准AOAC法和好氧平板计数法分别评价所收集的干燥样品的感官品质、营养品质和微生物品质。市场样品与干燥中心样品在感官上无显著差异。水分含量最高的是市场上的孟买鸭(29.78%),最低的是干燥中心的鲳鱼(20.06%)。蛋白质含量最高的是烘干中心的鲳鱼(60.73%),最低的是市场上的孟买鸭(47.9%)。脂质和灰分含量分别为2.85% ~ 7.20%和13.98% ~ 19.57%。从微生物学角度看,中国鲳鱼的好氧平板计数(APC)、总大肠杆菌计数(TEC)和总沙门氏菌计数(TSC)较高,分别为1.96×106 CFU/g、3.98×105 CFU/g和1.62×105 CFU/g,而孟买鸭的最低计数分别为5.05×105、2.22×105和0.81×105。带鱼未发现沙门氏菌。从感官品质和营养品质两方面进行了研究,结果表明,在研究的3个品种和2个地点中,鱼干中心的干孟买鸭具有较好的品质特征。然而,较高的微生物负荷,特别是致病性TSC和TEC表明,生产者需要改善卫生和卫生习惯,改善市场分销和储存设施,以获得安全和高质量的干鱼产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative assessment of dried fish quality collected from market and drying centre at Kuakata in Patuakhali, Bangladesh
The study identified the quality differences of dried Chinese pomfret (Stromateus chinensis), Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) and ribbon fish (Trichiurus haumela) from market and drying center at Kuakata, Patuakhali. The sensory, nutritional and microbial quality of collected dried samples were evaluated following organoleptic quality index, standard AOAC and aerobic plate count methods, respectively. Organoleptically no significant difference found between the samples from market and drying center. The highest moisture content value was obtained in Bombay duck (29.78%) from the market and lowest value in Chinese pomfret (20.06%) from drying center. The highest and lowest protein content was in Chinese pomfret (60.73%) and Bombay duck (47.9%) from drying center and market, respectively. The lipid and ash content varied from 2.85% to 7.20% and 13.98% to 19.57% for all the dried fish species collected from both sites. Microbiologically, higher aerobic plate count (APC), total E. coli count (TEC) and total Salmonella count (TSC) were found in Chinese pomfret at 1.96×106 CFU/g, 3.98×105 CFU/g and 1.62×105 CFU/g from market and lowest count found in Bombay duck at 5.05×105, 2.22×105 and 0.81×105 from drying center, respectively. In ribbon fish no Salmonella sp. was found. Based on the sensory and nutritional quality the study conclude that among three species and two sites studied, the dried Bombay duck from the fish drying center had better quality characteristics than the counter parts. However, higher microbial load especially pathogenic TSC and TEC suggests to improve hygiene and sanitary practices, better market distribution and storage facilities need to be followed by the producers for safe and quality dried fishery products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信