光与影:欣赏探究，沟通伦理素养，阿片类药物流行

Qualitative Research Reports in Communication Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17459435.2018.1529699

Craig T. Maier

{"title":"光与影:欣赏探究，沟通伦理素养，阿片类药物流行","authors":"Craig T. Maier","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2018.1529699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the interrelationship between Cooperrider’s (Barrett & Cooperrider, 1990) appreciative inquiry (AI) and Arnett, Fritz, and Bell’s (2009) communication ethics literacy (CEL) through interviews with professionals struggling with a mid-Atlantic city’s opioid epidemic. Findings suggest that AI can pinpoint the “light” groups protect and promote, while CEL can clarify “shadows” hindering AI implementations and propose communicative practices to strengthen those goods.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Light and shadows: Appreciative inquiry, communication ethics literacy, and the opioid epidemic\",\"authors\":\"Craig T. Maier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459435.2018.1529699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the interrelationship between Cooperrider’s (Barrett & Cooperrider, 1990) appreciative inquiry (AI) and Arnett, Fritz, and Bell’s (2009) communication ethics literacy (CEL) through interviews with professionals struggling with a mid-Atlantic city’s opioid epidemic. Findings suggest that AI can pinpoint the “light” groups protect and promote, while CEL can clarify “shadows” hindering AI implementations and propose communicative practices to strengthen those goods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2018.1529699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2018.1529699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过采访与大西洋中部城市阿片类药物流行作斗争的专业人士，探讨了Cooperrider (Barrett & Cooperrider, 1990)的欣赏性询问(AI)与Arnett, Fritz, and Bell(2009)的沟通伦理素养(CEL)之间的相互关系。研究结果表明，人工智能可以确定保护和促进的“光明”群体，而CEL可以澄清阻碍人工智能实施的“阴影”，并提出沟通实践来加强这些好处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Light and shadows: Appreciative inquiry, communication ethics literacy, and the opioid epidemic

This study explores the interrelationship between Cooperrider’s (Barrett & Cooperrider, 1990) appreciative inquiry (AI) and Arnett, Fritz, and Bell’s (2009) communication ethics literacy (CEL) through interviews with professionals struggling with a mid-Atlantic city’s opioid epidemic. Findings suggest that AI can pinpoint the “light” groups protect and promote, while CEL can clarify “shadows” hindering AI implementations and propose communicative practices to strengthen those goods.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Qualitative Research Reports in Communication

自引率

0.00%

发文量