行政司法的当前问题:审查行政复议、更好的初审决定和法庭改革

Robert Thomas, Joe Tomlinson
{"title":"行政司法的当前问题:审查行政复议、更好的初审决定和法庭改革","authors":"Robert Thomas, Joe Tomlinson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2940783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report (co-authored with Professor Robert Thomas) emerged out of a research project — entitled “Administrative Justice: engaging with government to improve administrative decision-making” — funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Impact Acceleration Account. That project, and our report, was designed to explore three key issues: (1) how can government departments and public authorities raise the quality of their decision-making?; (2) how do internal administrative review systems operate?; and (3) what is the future of tribunals? The report offers some reflections on the operation of administrative justice. It draws on the shared learning and experiences of those involved with seminar discussions to identify elements of the system that have worked well and potential areas for improvement. Based on the discussions, we offer three core recommendations concerning each of our three question. These findings seek to contribute to the public debate and offer critical reflections on how to develop and improve the work of administrative justice in the future.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Issues in Administrative Justice: Examining Administrative Review, Better Initial Decisions, and Tribunal Reform\",\"authors\":\"Robert Thomas, Joe Tomlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2940783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report (co-authored with Professor Robert Thomas) emerged out of a research project — entitled “Administrative Justice: engaging with government to improve administrative decision-making” — funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Impact Acceleration Account. That project, and our report, was designed to explore three key issues: (1) how can government departments and public authorities raise the quality of their decision-making?; (2) how do internal administrative review systems operate?; and (3) what is the future of tribunals? The report offers some reflections on the operation of administrative justice. It draws on the shared learning and experiences of those involved with seminar discussions to identify elements of the system that have worked well and potential areas for improvement. Based on the discussions, we offer three core recommendations concerning each of our three question. These findings seek to contribute to the public debate and offer critical reflections on how to develop and improve the work of administrative justice in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2940783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2940783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这份报告(与罗伯特·托马斯教授合著)来自一个名为“行政公正:与政府合作改善行政决策”的研究项目,该项目由经济和社会研究理事会影响加速账户资助。该项目和我们的报告旨在探讨三个关键问题:(1)政府部门和公共当局如何提高决策质量?(二)内部行政复议制度如何运行?(3)法庭的未来是什么?该报告对行政司法的运作提出了一些思考。它借鉴了参与研讨会讨论的人员的共同学习和经验,以确定系统中工作良好的要素和可能改进的领域。在讨论的基础上,我们针对这三个问题分别提出三条核心建议。这些调查结果旨在促进公众辩论,并就今后如何发展和改进行政司法工作提出批判性的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Issues in Administrative Justice: Examining Administrative Review, Better Initial Decisions, and Tribunal Reform
This report (co-authored with Professor Robert Thomas) emerged out of a research project — entitled “Administrative Justice: engaging with government to improve administrative decision-making” — funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Impact Acceleration Account. That project, and our report, was designed to explore three key issues: (1) how can government departments and public authorities raise the quality of their decision-making?; (2) how do internal administrative review systems operate?; and (3) what is the future of tribunals? The report offers some reflections on the operation of administrative justice. It draws on the shared learning and experiences of those involved with seminar discussions to identify elements of the system that have worked well and potential areas for improvement. Based on the discussions, we offer three core recommendations concerning each of our three question. These findings seek to contribute to the public debate and offer critical reflections on how to develop and improve the work of administrative justice in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信