摇尾巴:操纵基准利率——竞争的焦点

A. Pascall
{"title":"摇尾巴:操纵基准利率——竞争的焦点","authors":"A. Pascall","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2836876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manipulation of financial benchmarks, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), has resulted in swift enforcement by regulators across the globe and the imposition of a multitude of impressive fines. In 2013, the European Commission settled with eight financial institutions for EUR 1.7 billion for their role in an alleged cartel relating to interest rate derivatives pegged to Libor. This article seeks to analyse the manipulation of financial benchmarks under Article 101(1) TFEU from both an economic and legal perspective. It is hoped that this exercise will shed some much needed light on what remains a relatively obscure area in competition law. Following the analysis herein, it is argued that EU competition law, in its current guise, is not well placed to deal with the mischief at issue. In light of the specificities of Libor and the markets in which products indexed to Libor are traded, the manipulation should, instead, be left to market regulatory tools specifically designed for this purpose.","PeriodicalId":330395,"journal":{"name":"Fordham Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tail Wagging the Dog: The Manipulation of Benchmark Rates – A Competitive Bone of Contention\",\"authors\":\"A. Pascall\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2836876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The manipulation of financial benchmarks, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), has resulted in swift enforcement by regulators across the globe and the imposition of a multitude of impressive fines. In 2013, the European Commission settled with eight financial institutions for EUR 1.7 billion for their role in an alleged cartel relating to interest rate derivatives pegged to Libor. This article seeks to analyse the manipulation of financial benchmarks under Article 101(1) TFEU from both an economic and legal perspective. It is hoped that this exercise will shed some much needed light on what remains a relatively obscure area in competition law. Following the analysis herein, it is argued that EU competition law, in its current guise, is not well placed to deal with the mischief at issue. In light of the specificities of Libor and the markets in which products indexed to Libor are traded, the manipulation should, instead, be left to market regulatory tools specifically designed for this purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fordham Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fordham Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2836876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fordham Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2836876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对伦敦银行同业拆借利率(Libor)等金融基准的操纵,已导致全球监管机构迅速采取行动,并处以巨额罚款。2013年,欧盟委员会(European Commission)与八家金融机构达成和解,赔偿17亿欧元,原因是它们涉嫌与伦敦银行间同业拆借利率(Libor)挂钩的利率衍生品勾结。本文试图从经济和法律的角度分析第101(1)条TFEU下的金融基准操纵。希望这项工作将对竞争法中一个相对模糊的领域提供一些急需的启示。根据本文的分析,本文认为,欧盟竞争法,在其目前的幌子下,并不能很好地处理所讨论的恶作剧。鉴于Libor的特殊性,以及与Libor挂钩的产品交易市场的特殊性,操纵应该留给专门为此目的设计的市场监管工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tail Wagging the Dog: The Manipulation of Benchmark Rates – A Competitive Bone of Contention
The manipulation of financial benchmarks, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), has resulted in swift enforcement by regulators across the globe and the imposition of a multitude of impressive fines. In 2013, the European Commission settled with eight financial institutions for EUR 1.7 billion for their role in an alleged cartel relating to interest rate derivatives pegged to Libor. This article seeks to analyse the manipulation of financial benchmarks under Article 101(1) TFEU from both an economic and legal perspective. It is hoped that this exercise will shed some much needed light on what remains a relatively obscure area in competition law. Following the analysis herein, it is argued that EU competition law, in its current guise, is not well placed to deal with the mischief at issue. In light of the specificities of Libor and the markets in which products indexed to Libor are traded, the manipulation should, instead, be left to market regulatory tools specifically designed for this purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信