人体模型中原位电场与外加磁场强度的关系——IEEE C95.6标准理性再谈

Katsuaki Aga, A. Hirata, I. Laakso
{"title":"人体模型中原位电场与外加磁场强度的关系——IEEE C95.6标准理性再谈","authors":"Katsuaki Aga, A. Hirata, I. Laakso","doi":"10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2018.8485010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IEEE C95.1 (radio frequency) and C95.6 (low frequency) standards for human protection from electromagnetic fields are being under revision. In the next revision, they will be combined into one standard. Even though C95.1 standard considers anatomical human models for deriving the relationship between internal and external field strengths, ellipse is used in C95.6 (low frequency) standard. It is worth computing their relationship and associated technical issues when using anatomical models. In this study, two different codes developed at Nagoya Institute of Technology and Aalto University were used for inter-comparison. Computational results suggested that the relationship between in-situ and external field strengths are in good agreement when considering 99th percentile of in-situ electric field; less than 10%. The classification of body parts is one of the essential factors for determining the in-situ field strength in ‘the limb’ and ‘other tissues’.","PeriodicalId":376960,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between In-Situ Electric Field and External Magnetic Field Strength in Human Models-Rational of IEEE C95.6 Standard Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Katsuaki Aga, A. Hirata, I. Laakso\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2018.8485010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IEEE C95.1 (radio frequency) and C95.6 (low frequency) standards for human protection from electromagnetic fields are being under revision. In the next revision, they will be combined into one standard. Even though C95.1 standard considers anatomical human models for deriving the relationship between internal and external field strengths, ellipse is used in C95.6 (low frequency) standard. It is worth computing their relationship and associated technical issues when using anatomical models. In this study, two different codes developed at Nagoya Institute of Technology and Aalto University were used for inter-comparison. Computational results suggested that the relationship between in-situ and external field strengths are in good agreement when considering 99th percentile of in-situ electric field; less than 10%. The classification of body parts is one of the essential factors for determining the in-situ field strength in ‘the limb’ and ‘other tissues’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2018.8485010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEUROPE.2018.8485010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

IEEE C95.1(射频)和C95.6(低频)人体电磁场防护标准正在修订中。在下一次修订中,它们将合并为一个标准。尽管C95.1标准考虑了人体解剖模型来推导内外场强的关系,但C95.6(低频)标准使用了椭圆。在使用解剖模型时,计算它们的关系和相关的技术问题是值得的。在本研究中,使用名古屋工业学院和阿尔托大学开发的两种不同的代码进行相互比较。计算结果表明,当考虑第99百分位地电场时,地场强与外场强之间的关系是一致的;不到10%。身体部位的分类是确定“肢体”和“其他组织”原位场强的重要因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between In-Situ Electric Field and External Magnetic Field Strength in Human Models-Rational of IEEE C95.6 Standard Revisited
IEEE C95.1 (radio frequency) and C95.6 (low frequency) standards for human protection from electromagnetic fields are being under revision. In the next revision, they will be combined into one standard. Even though C95.1 standard considers anatomical human models for deriving the relationship between internal and external field strengths, ellipse is used in C95.6 (low frequency) standard. It is worth computing their relationship and associated technical issues when using anatomical models. In this study, two different codes developed at Nagoya Institute of Technology and Aalto University were used for inter-comparison. Computational results suggested that the relationship between in-situ and external field strengths are in good agreement when considering 99th percentile of in-situ electric field; less than 10%. The classification of body parts is one of the essential factors for determining the in-situ field strength in ‘the limb’ and ‘other tissues’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信