光网:未来实时高速广播网络的协议

[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s Pub Date : 1988-09-14 DOI:10.1109/FTDCS.1988.26682

P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler

{"title":"光网:未来实时高速广播网络的协议","authors":"P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler","doi":"10.1109/FTDCS.1988.26682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A set of high-speed protocols working on unidirectional broadcast systems is defined. Lightnet 1 is based on collision avoidance and a simple reservation scheme; Lightnet 2 is a version for heavy loads; and Lightnet 3 is designed to work on a ring topology. Three analytical models are developed to evaluate the performances of these protocols. Comparisons between analytical and simulation results show the accuracy of these models. A careful comparison between Lightnet I and Expressnet shows that the former outperforms the latter both for average delay and for flexibility to various kinds of traffic mixes under the assumption of uniform packet size.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384536,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lightnet: a protocol for future real time high speed broadcast networks\",\"authors\":\"P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FTDCS.1988.26682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A set of high-speed protocols working on unidirectional broadcast systems is defined. Lightnet 1 is based on collision avoidance and a simple reservation scheme; Lightnet 2 is a version for heavy loads; and Lightnet 3 is designed to work on a ring topology. Three analytical models are developed to evaluate the performances of these protocols. Comparisons between analytical and simulation results show the accuracy of these models. A careful comparison between Lightnet I and Expressnet shows that the former outperforms the latter both for average delay and for flexibility to various kinds of traffic mixes under the assumption of uniform packet size.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":384536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTDCS.1988.26682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTDCS.1988.26682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

定义了一套适用于单向广播系统的高速协议。Lightnet 1是基于避免碰撞和一个简单的预约方案;Lightnet 2是一个用于重载的版本;Lightnet 3设计用于环形拓扑结构。建立了三个分析模型来评估这些协议的性能。分析结果与仿真结果的比较表明了模型的准确性。对Lightnet I和Expressnet的仔细比较表明，在假设均匀数据包大小的情况下，前者在平均延迟和对各种流量混合的灵活性方面都优于后者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Lightnet: a protocol for future real time high speed broadcast networks

A set of high-speed protocols working on unidirectional broadcast systems is defined. Lightnet 1 is based on collision avoidance and a simple reservation scheme; Lightnet 2 is a version for heavy loads; and Lightnet 3 is designed to work on a ring topology. Three analytical models are developed to evaluate the performances of these protocols. Comparisons between analytical and simulation results show the accuracy of these models. A careful comparison between Lightnet I and Expressnet shows that the former outperforms the latter both for average delay and for flexibility to various kinds of traffic mixes under the assumption of uniform packet size.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

[1988] Proceedings. Workshop on the Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems in the 1990s

自引率

0.00%

发文量