A. Zope, A. Schemmel, Xiao Wang, S. Bhushan, Prashant Singh, E. Luke
{"title":"混合RANS/LES湍流模型在热流体应用中的预测能力评估","authors":"A. Zope, A. Schemmel, Xiao Wang, S. Bhushan, Prashant Singh, E. Luke","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2021-65808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we have assessed performance of URANS model, various hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models such as detached eddy simulation, Nichols-Nelson HRLES model, dynamic HRLES (DHRL) model, as well as LES for two classes of problems: (a) heat transfer due to subsonic swirling flow subjected to a sudden expansion leading to cylindrical chamber, and (b) flow separation due to oblique shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI). The results are assessed using the heat transfer characteristics, separation and reattachment characteristics, and capability to predict flow unsteadiness. The study indicates that URANS can predict large scale flow features reasonably well. However, it fails to resolve turbulence. PANS improves TKE prediction, hence, improves heat transfer prediction. Among the hybrid RANS/LES models, DHRL coupled with ILES is capable of providing accurate prediction of flow separation/reattachment characteristics for boundary layer flows. For free-shear dominated flows, implicit LES performs better compared to the explicit LES models.","PeriodicalId":359619,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Aerospace Engineering Division Joint Track; Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Predictive Capability of Hybrid RANS/LES Turbulence Models for Thermofluid Applications\",\"authors\":\"A. Zope, A. Schemmel, Xiao Wang, S. Bhushan, Prashant Singh, E. Luke\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/fedsm2021-65808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this study, we have assessed performance of URANS model, various hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models such as detached eddy simulation, Nichols-Nelson HRLES model, dynamic HRLES (DHRL) model, as well as LES for two classes of problems: (a) heat transfer due to subsonic swirling flow subjected to a sudden expansion leading to cylindrical chamber, and (b) flow separation due to oblique shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI). The results are assessed using the heat transfer characteristics, separation and reattachment characteristics, and capability to predict flow unsteadiness. The study indicates that URANS can predict large scale flow features reasonably well. However, it fails to resolve turbulence. PANS improves TKE prediction, hence, improves heat transfer prediction. Among the hybrid RANS/LES models, DHRL coupled with ILES is capable of providing accurate prediction of flow separation/reattachment characteristics for boundary layer flows. For free-shear dominated flows, implicit LES performs better compared to the explicit LES models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1: Aerospace Engineering Division Joint Track; Computational Fluid Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1: Aerospace Engineering Division Joint Track; Computational Fluid Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2021-65808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Aerospace Engineering Division Joint Track; Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2021-65808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Predictive Capability of Hybrid RANS/LES Turbulence Models for Thermofluid Applications
In this study, we have assessed performance of URANS model, various hybrid RANS/LES turbulence models such as detached eddy simulation, Nichols-Nelson HRLES model, dynamic HRLES (DHRL) model, as well as LES for two classes of problems: (a) heat transfer due to subsonic swirling flow subjected to a sudden expansion leading to cylindrical chamber, and (b) flow separation due to oblique shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction (STBLI). The results are assessed using the heat transfer characteristics, separation and reattachment characteristics, and capability to predict flow unsteadiness. The study indicates that URANS can predict large scale flow features reasonably well. However, it fails to resolve turbulence. PANS improves TKE prediction, hence, improves heat transfer prediction. Among the hybrid RANS/LES models, DHRL coupled with ILES is capable of providing accurate prediction of flow separation/reattachment characteristics for boundary layer flows. For free-shear dominated flows, implicit LES performs better compared to the explicit LES models.