解密和减轻TCP封顶

Qingkai Meng, Fengyuan Ren, Tong Zhang, Danfeng Shan, Yajun Yang
{"title":"解密和减轻TCP封顶","authors":"Qingkai Meng, Fengyuan Ren, Tong Zhang, Danfeng Shan, Yajun Yang","doi":"10.1109/IWQoS54832.2022.9812892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s Internet user experience greatly depends on some user-perceived network metrics, such as throughput and latency. To improve these metrics, many Internet content providers build the content delivery network (CDN) to provide their services. Generally, CDNs adopt TCP as their transport protocol. A recent line of work improves TCP by proposing novel congestion control algorithms. However, we measure TCP performance in the production CDN and identify an interesting phenomenon termed TCP capping. When the flows experience TCP capping, the fixed-size receive window (rwnd) restricts these flows from fully utilizing network bandwidth. Through in-depth analysis, we demystify that the root cause of TCP capping is an inappropriate constraint on rwnd due to not considering the receiver’s processing capability. To mitigate it, this paper proposes a server-side scheme Apollo and a client-side scheme Artemis for Internet content providers and users, respectively. Apollo probes the receiver’s processing capability and assists the sender in packet sending. And Artemis adjusts the receive buffer in light of the receiver’s processing capability. In our evaluation, compared to vanilla TCP, TCP (w/ Apollo) and TCP (w/ Artemis) shorten flow completion time by up to 91.8% and 94.9%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":353365,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 30th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying and Mitigating TCP Capping\",\"authors\":\"Qingkai Meng, Fengyuan Ren, Tong Zhang, Danfeng Shan, Yajun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWQoS54832.2022.9812892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today’s Internet user experience greatly depends on some user-perceived network metrics, such as throughput and latency. To improve these metrics, many Internet content providers build the content delivery network (CDN) to provide their services. Generally, CDNs adopt TCP as their transport protocol. A recent line of work improves TCP by proposing novel congestion control algorithms. However, we measure TCP performance in the production CDN and identify an interesting phenomenon termed TCP capping. When the flows experience TCP capping, the fixed-size receive window (rwnd) restricts these flows from fully utilizing network bandwidth. Through in-depth analysis, we demystify that the root cause of TCP capping is an inappropriate constraint on rwnd due to not considering the receiver’s processing capability. To mitigate it, this paper proposes a server-side scheme Apollo and a client-side scheme Artemis for Internet content providers and users, respectively. Apollo probes the receiver’s processing capability and assists the sender in packet sending. And Artemis adjusts the receive buffer in light of the receiver’s processing capability. In our evaluation, compared to vanilla TCP, TCP (w/ Apollo) and TCP (w/ Artemis) shorten flow completion time by up to 91.8% and 94.9%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 30th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 30th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQoS54832.2022.9812892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 30th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQoS54832.2022.9812892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天的互联网用户体验在很大程度上依赖于一些用户感知的网络指标,比如吞吐量和延迟。为了改进这些指标,许多互联网内容提供商构建了内容交付网络(CDN)来提供他们的服务。cdn通常采用TCP作为传输协议。最近的一项工作通过提出新的拥塞控制算法来改进TCP。然而,我们测量了生产CDN中的TCP性能,并发现了一个有趣的现象,称为TCP封顶。当流经历TCP封顶时,固定大小的接收窗口(rwind)限制了这些流充分利用网络带宽。通过深入分析,我们揭示了TCP封顶的根本原因是由于没有考虑接收方的处理能力而对rwnd的限制不适当。为了缓解这一问题,本文分别针对互联网内容提供商和用户提出了服务器端方案Apollo和客户端方案Artemis。阿波罗探测接收方的处理能力,并协助发送方发送数据包。阿尔忒弥斯根据接收器的处理能力调整接收缓冲区。在我们的评估中,与普通TCP相比,TCP (w/ Apollo)和TCP (w/ Artemis)分别缩短了91.8%和94.9%的流量完成时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demystifying and Mitigating TCP Capping
Today’s Internet user experience greatly depends on some user-perceived network metrics, such as throughput and latency. To improve these metrics, many Internet content providers build the content delivery network (CDN) to provide their services. Generally, CDNs adopt TCP as their transport protocol. A recent line of work improves TCP by proposing novel congestion control algorithms. However, we measure TCP performance in the production CDN and identify an interesting phenomenon termed TCP capping. When the flows experience TCP capping, the fixed-size receive window (rwnd) restricts these flows from fully utilizing network bandwidth. Through in-depth analysis, we demystify that the root cause of TCP capping is an inappropriate constraint on rwnd due to not considering the receiver’s processing capability. To mitigate it, this paper proposes a server-side scheme Apollo and a client-side scheme Artemis for Internet content providers and users, respectively. Apollo probes the receiver’s processing capability and assists the sender in packet sending. And Artemis adjusts the receive buffer in light of the receiver’s processing capability. In our evaluation, compared to vanilla TCP, TCP (w/ Apollo) and TCP (w/ Artemis) shorten flow completion time by up to 91.8% and 94.9%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信