使研究生英语课程成为一个有机的、综合的学习过程

R. Jaidev
{"title":"使研究生英语课程成为一个有机的、综合的学习过程","authors":"R. Jaidev","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvpb3w0t.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will report on the curriculum review conducted on an intermediate level Graduate English Course (GEC) at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The review involved examining the feedback of slightly over 200 students in the previous semester on the course as it existed, materials and pedagogy. It also involved conducting in-depth interviews with students and tutors. The review revealed that the course, thus far, had in fact aimed to: 1) develop students’ general writing skills, 2) equip students with strategies for the development of productive vocabulary, and 3) develop students’ ability to produce texts with general characteristics of academic writing. However, the piecemeal nature of the course curriculum though useful in addressing students’ lack of grammar and vocabulary while also trying to introduce text-patterns and rhetorical moves associated with writing of a research paper, caused the teaching to be atomistic in nature. That is to say that at the end of the course students were able to appreciate the separate pieces of the puzzle without seeing the whole, big picture. This became obvious in the fact that while students responded well to the assessment of individual aspects of the curriculum, they still demonstrated difficulty when called upon to communicate their research in their disciplines, in English, which in fact was what this course was aimed to facilitate. This inability to engage in the discussion of their research on a deeper level both in writing and speaking was perceived by the researchers as an inability to connect the individual pieces to produce a whole picture. Therefore the aim was to design a more integrated curriculum through which students could see the purpose of every aspect that they were learning in class as a significant part of the whole and before we embarked on this process, we designed and administered a pre-course survey on 94 students in the incoming cohort of the new semester. This paper documents the re-designing of this course to one that facilitates a more organic and integrated learning process for the students.","PeriodicalId":178257,"journal":{"name":"Applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning beyond the Individual Classroom","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making a Graduate English Course an Organic and Integrated Learning Process\",\"authors\":\"R. Jaidev\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvpb3w0t.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will report on the curriculum review conducted on an intermediate level Graduate English Course (GEC) at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The review involved examining the feedback of slightly over 200 students in the previous semester on the course as it existed, materials and pedagogy. It also involved conducting in-depth interviews with students and tutors. The review revealed that the course, thus far, had in fact aimed to: 1) develop students’ general writing skills, 2) equip students with strategies for the development of productive vocabulary, and 3) develop students’ ability to produce texts with general characteristics of academic writing. However, the piecemeal nature of the course curriculum though useful in addressing students’ lack of grammar and vocabulary while also trying to introduce text-patterns and rhetorical moves associated with writing of a research paper, caused the teaching to be atomistic in nature. That is to say that at the end of the course students were able to appreciate the separate pieces of the puzzle without seeing the whole, big picture. This became obvious in the fact that while students responded well to the assessment of individual aspects of the curriculum, they still demonstrated difficulty when called upon to communicate their research in their disciplines, in English, which in fact was what this course was aimed to facilitate. This inability to engage in the discussion of their research on a deeper level both in writing and speaking was perceived by the researchers as an inability to connect the individual pieces to produce a whole picture. Therefore the aim was to design a more integrated curriculum through which students could see the purpose of every aspect that they were learning in class as a significant part of the whole and before we embarked on this process, we designed and administered a pre-course survey on 94 students in the incoming cohort of the new semester. This paper documents the re-designing of this course to one that facilitates a more organic and integrated learning process for the students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning beyond the Individual Classroom\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning beyond the Individual Classroom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpb3w0t.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applying the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning beyond the Individual Classroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpb3w0t.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将报道新加坡国立大学(NUS)中级研究生英语课程(GEC)的课程审查。审查包括检查200多名学生在上学期对现有课程、材料和教学法的反馈。它还包括对学生和导师进行深入采访。回顾发现,到目前为止,该课程实际上旨在:1)培养学生的一般写作技巧;2)使学生掌握发展生产性词汇的策略;3)培养学生创作具有学术写作一般特征的文本的能力。然而,该课程的零敲碎打性质虽然有助于解决学生缺乏语法和词汇的问题,同时也试图引入与研究论文写作相关的文本模式和修辞动作,但导致教学本质上是原子式的。也就是说,在课程结束时,学生们能够欣赏拼图的各个部分,而不必看到整体的大画面。这一点在以下事实中变得很明显:虽然学生对课程的各个方面的评估反应良好,但当要求他们用英语交流自己学科的研究时,他们仍然表现出困难,而这实际上正是这门课程旨在促进的。研究人员认为,无论是在书面还是口头上,这种无法在更深层次上参与研究讨论的能力,就是无法将单个片段联系起来,形成一个整体。因此,我们的目标是设计一个更加综合的课程,通过这个课程,学生们可以看到他们在课堂上学习的每一个方面的目的都是整体的重要组成部分。在我们开始这个过程之前,我们设计并管理了一项课前调查,调查对象是新学期即将到来的94名学生。这篇论文记录了这门课程的重新设计,以促进学生更有机和综合的学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making a Graduate English Course an Organic and Integrated Learning Process
This paper will report on the curriculum review conducted on an intermediate level Graduate English Course (GEC) at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The review involved examining the feedback of slightly over 200 students in the previous semester on the course as it existed, materials and pedagogy. It also involved conducting in-depth interviews with students and tutors. The review revealed that the course, thus far, had in fact aimed to: 1) develop students’ general writing skills, 2) equip students with strategies for the development of productive vocabulary, and 3) develop students’ ability to produce texts with general characteristics of academic writing. However, the piecemeal nature of the course curriculum though useful in addressing students’ lack of grammar and vocabulary while also trying to introduce text-patterns and rhetorical moves associated with writing of a research paper, caused the teaching to be atomistic in nature. That is to say that at the end of the course students were able to appreciate the separate pieces of the puzzle without seeing the whole, big picture. This became obvious in the fact that while students responded well to the assessment of individual aspects of the curriculum, they still demonstrated difficulty when called upon to communicate their research in their disciplines, in English, which in fact was what this course was aimed to facilitate. This inability to engage in the discussion of their research on a deeper level both in writing and speaking was perceived by the researchers as an inability to connect the individual pieces to produce a whole picture. Therefore the aim was to design a more integrated curriculum through which students could see the purpose of every aspect that they were learning in class as a significant part of the whole and before we embarked on this process, we designed and administered a pre-course survey on 94 students in the incoming cohort of the new semester. This paper documents the re-designing of this course to one that facilitates a more organic and integrated learning process for the students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信