雇佣案件中国家豁免和合同法庭选择条款的相互作用:回归常态

Pierfrancesco Rossi
{"title":"雇佣案件中国家豁免和合同法庭选择条款的相互作用:回归常态","authors":"Pierfrancesco Rossi","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03010011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn Judgment No. 18801 of 2022, in the context of an employment dispute with a foreign State, the Corte di Cassazione declined to give effect to a contract clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the courts of the employer State and upheld Italian jurisdiction. With this decision, which was based on the limitations on party autonomy in respect to contracts of employment set forth in the EU Brussels I Regulation, the Court drastically departed from recent precedents where it had declined jurisdiction in the presence of similar contract clauses. Such precedents, in their turn, stood in stark contrast to the earlier jurisprudence of the Court, where jurisdiction had been affirmed based on the Brussels I Regulation. This contribution argues that this ruling constitutes a welcome and much-needed turnaround, bringing the Court’s case law back into line with EU law and the case law of the European Court of Justice and significantly improving the judicial protection afforded to employees of foreign States in Italy – a veritable return to normalcy in employment disputes with foreign States.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Interplay of State Immunity and Contractual Forum Selection Clauses in Employment Cases: Return to Normalcy\",\"authors\":\"Pierfrancesco Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-03010011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn Judgment No. 18801 of 2022, in the context of an employment dispute with a foreign State, the Corte di Cassazione declined to give effect to a contract clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the courts of the employer State and upheld Italian jurisdiction. With this decision, which was based on the limitations on party autonomy in respect to contracts of employment set forth in the EU Brussels I Regulation, the Court drastically departed from recent precedents where it had declined jurisdiction in the presence of similar contract clauses. Such precedents, in their turn, stood in stark contrast to the earlier jurisprudence of the Court, where jurisdiction had been affirmed based on the Brussels I Regulation. This contribution argues that this ruling constitutes a welcome and much-needed turnaround, bringing the Court’s case law back into line with EU law and the case law of the European Court of Justice and significantly improving the judicial protection afforded to employees of foreign States in Italy – a veritable return to normalcy in employment disputes with foreign States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2022年第18801号判决中,关于与外国的就业纠纷,Cassazione法院拒绝执行授予雇主国法院专属管辖权的合同条款,并支持意大利管辖权。法院的这一决定是根据《欧盟布鲁塞尔第一条例》对雇佣合同当事人自主权的限制作出的,这一决定彻底背离了最近的先例,即法院在存在类似合同条款的情况下拒绝管辖权。这些先例反过来又与法院早先的判例形成鲜明对比,在判例中,管辖权是根据布鲁塞尔第一规则予以确认的。这篇文章认为,这项裁决是一个受欢迎和急需的转变,使法院的判例法重新与欧盟法和欧洲法院的判例法保持一致,并大大改善了向在意大利的外国雇员提供的司法保护- -在与外国的就业纠纷中真正恢复正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Interplay of State Immunity and Contractual Forum Selection Clauses in Employment Cases: Return to Normalcy
In Judgment No. 18801 of 2022, in the context of an employment dispute with a foreign State, the Corte di Cassazione declined to give effect to a contract clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the courts of the employer State and upheld Italian jurisdiction. With this decision, which was based on the limitations on party autonomy in respect to contracts of employment set forth in the EU Brussels I Regulation, the Court drastically departed from recent precedents where it had declined jurisdiction in the presence of similar contract clauses. Such precedents, in their turn, stood in stark contrast to the earlier jurisprudence of the Court, where jurisdiction had been affirmed based on the Brussels I Regulation. This contribution argues that this ruling constitutes a welcome and much-needed turnaround, bringing the Court’s case law back into line with EU law and the case law of the European Court of Justice and significantly improving the judicial protection afforded to employees of foreign States in Italy – a veritable return to normalcy in employment disputes with foreign States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信