IRIS的安全性和可用性分析与可视化

Shamal Faily, I. Flechais
{"title":"IRIS的安全性和可用性分析与可视化","authors":"Shamal Faily, I. Flechais","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2010.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a long standing need to incorporate human factors into security risk analysis, taking a balanced approach to analysing security and usability concerns remains a challenge. Balancing security and usability is difficult due to human biases in security perception, and managing the sheer volume of data arising from risk and task analysis. This paper presents an approach for qualitatively and quantitively analysing and visualising the results of risk and task analysis. We demonstrate this approach using a realistic example, and we discuss how these techniques fit within the larger context of secure systems design.","PeriodicalId":360339,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing and Visualising Security and Usability in IRIS\",\"authors\":\"Shamal Faily, I. Flechais\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2010.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite a long standing need to incorporate human factors into security risk analysis, taking a balanced approach to analysing security and usability concerns remains a challenge. Balancing security and usability is difficult due to human biases in security perception, and managing the sheer volume of data arising from risk and task analysis. This paper presents an approach for qualitatively and quantitively analysing and visualising the results of risk and task analysis. We demonstrate this approach using a realistic example, and we discuss how these techniques fit within the larger context of secure systems design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2010.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2010.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

尽管长期以来一直需要将人为因素合并到安全风险分析中,但采取平衡的方法来分析安全性和可用性问题仍然是一个挑战。由于人类在安全感知上的偏见,以及管理风险和任务分析产生的大量数据,平衡安全性和可用性是很困难的。本文提出了一种对风险和任务分析结果进行定性和定量分析和可视化的方法。我们使用一个实际的示例来演示这种方法,并讨论这些技术如何适用于更大的安全系统设计上下文中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing and Visualising Security and Usability in IRIS
Despite a long standing need to incorporate human factors into security risk analysis, taking a balanced approach to analysing security and usability concerns remains a challenge. Balancing security and usability is difficult due to human biases in security perception, and managing the sheer volume of data arising from risk and task analysis. This paper presents an approach for qualitatively and quantitively analysing and visualising the results of risk and task analysis. We demonstrate this approach using a realistic example, and we discuss how these techniques fit within the larger context of secure systems design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信