逻辑悖论

H. Manev
{"title":"逻辑悖论","authors":"H. Manev","doi":"10.12988/imf.2020.91249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basic notions which refer to the so called logical paradoxes are analyzed. For illustrating of their systematizing according to the kind of breaking of the requirements for comprised, consistent and reasonable enough system of the notions, some well-known such paradoxes are considered. The received results elucidate on the foundations of cognition. Mathematics Subject Classification: Foundations of logics and of the sets","PeriodicalId":107214,"journal":{"name":"International Mathematical Forum","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The logical paradoxes\",\"authors\":\"H. Manev\",\"doi\":\"10.12988/imf.2020.91249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Basic notions which refer to the so called logical paradoxes are analyzed. For illustrating of their systematizing according to the kind of breaking of the requirements for comprised, consistent and reasonable enough system of the notions, some well-known such paradoxes are considered. The received results elucidate on the foundations of cognition. Mathematics Subject Classification: Foundations of logics and of the sets\",\"PeriodicalId\":107214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Mathematical Forum\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Mathematical Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2020.91249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Mathematical Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12988/imf.2020.91249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

分析了所谓逻辑悖论的基本概念。为了说明它们的系统化是如何打破概念的完整的、一致的和合理的系统的要求的,我们考虑了一些众所周知的这种悖论。所得结果阐明了认知的基础。数学学科分类:逻辑和集合的基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The logical paradoxes
Basic notions which refer to the so called logical paradoxes are analyzed. For illustrating of their systematizing according to the kind of breaking of the requirements for comprised, consistent and reasonable enough system of the notions, some well-known such paradoxes are considered. The received results elucidate on the foundations of cognition. Mathematics Subject Classification: Foundations of logics and of the sets
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信