{"title":"切尔诺夫茨州民族文化潜力博物馆的区域性组织","authors":"I. Kostaschuk, Roman-Volodymyr Kisil","doi":"10.17721/2308-135x.2021.64.42-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal of the article: Conduct research on the territorial organization of museums of different levels and types in the communities of Chernivtsi oblast as important objects of ethnocultural potential of the region. Identify the distribution of museums by different classification criteria and trace their importance for the development of certain types of tourism. Research methodology. To obtain information, various sources of information were first studied, namely: literary, official Internet portals of communities and districts of Chernivtsi Oblast State Administration and Chernivtsi Oblast Council. At the next stage, a fairly detailed database was formed, which reflects the types of museums according to all the classification features presented in the work, as well as their ethnicity. This allowed to establish the contribution of each ethnic group in the formation of ethnocultural potential of the region, which allows us to talk about cooperation with neighboring countries in the framework of ethnocultural interaction. Results of the research. Chernivtsi oblast is a striking example of ethnocontact and polyethnic region, in which Ukrainians, Romanians, Moldovans, Jews, Russians, Poles, Armenians and other ethnic groups created and continue to create their cultural heritage. Ukrainians in the region own 152 museums, Romanians – 12, Moldovans – 14, Russians – 1. Also, separate exhibitions are dedicated to the Jewish, Polish, German, Armenian and other ethnic groups. Of course, such differences in the ethnicity of museums, as an important component of ethnocultural development of the region, are of great practical and scientific importance. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a detailed classification of museums and their typology, as well as in identifying the place of museums in the ethnocultural development of the polyethnic region. These studies should be conducted in other regions of our country. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of finding investments to increase the tourist attractiveness of both individual administrative units and the region as a whole. Museums also play an important role in shaping the ethnic, historical, ethnocultural, national-patriotic and other perceptions of the territory and identity of their people.","PeriodicalId":395632,"journal":{"name":"GEOGRAPHY AND TOURISM","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF MUSEUMS AS OBJECTS OF ETHNOCULTURAL POTENTIAL OF CHERNIVTSI OBLAST\",\"authors\":\"I. Kostaschuk, Roman-Volodymyr Kisil\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/2308-135x.2021.64.42-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goal of the article: Conduct research on the territorial organization of museums of different levels and types in the communities of Chernivtsi oblast as important objects of ethnocultural potential of the region. Identify the distribution of museums by different classification criteria and trace their importance for the development of certain types of tourism. Research methodology. To obtain information, various sources of information were first studied, namely: literary, official Internet portals of communities and districts of Chernivtsi Oblast State Administration and Chernivtsi Oblast Council. At the next stage, a fairly detailed database was formed, which reflects the types of museums according to all the classification features presented in the work, as well as their ethnicity. This allowed to establish the contribution of each ethnic group in the formation of ethnocultural potential of the region, which allows us to talk about cooperation with neighboring countries in the framework of ethnocultural interaction. Results of the research. Chernivtsi oblast is a striking example of ethnocontact and polyethnic region, in which Ukrainians, Romanians, Moldovans, Jews, Russians, Poles, Armenians and other ethnic groups created and continue to create their cultural heritage. Ukrainians in the region own 152 museums, Romanians – 12, Moldovans – 14, Russians – 1. Also, separate exhibitions are dedicated to the Jewish, Polish, German, Armenian and other ethnic groups. Of course, such differences in the ethnicity of museums, as an important component of ethnocultural development of the region, are of great practical and scientific importance. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a detailed classification of museums and their typology, as well as in identifying the place of museums in the ethnocultural development of the polyethnic region. These studies should be conducted in other regions of our country. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of finding investments to increase the tourist attractiveness of both individual administrative units and the region as a whole. Museums also play an important role in shaping the ethnic, historical, ethnocultural, national-patriotic and other perceptions of the territory and identity of their people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEOGRAPHY AND TOURISM\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEOGRAPHY AND TOURISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/2308-135x.2021.64.42-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOGRAPHY AND TOURISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2308-135x.2021.64.42-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF MUSEUMS AS OBJECTS OF ETHNOCULTURAL POTENTIAL OF CHERNIVTSI OBLAST
Goal of the article: Conduct research on the territorial organization of museums of different levels and types in the communities of Chernivtsi oblast as important objects of ethnocultural potential of the region. Identify the distribution of museums by different classification criteria and trace their importance for the development of certain types of tourism. Research methodology. To obtain information, various sources of information were first studied, namely: literary, official Internet portals of communities and districts of Chernivtsi Oblast State Administration and Chernivtsi Oblast Council. At the next stage, a fairly detailed database was formed, which reflects the types of museums according to all the classification features presented in the work, as well as their ethnicity. This allowed to establish the contribution of each ethnic group in the formation of ethnocultural potential of the region, which allows us to talk about cooperation with neighboring countries in the framework of ethnocultural interaction. Results of the research. Chernivtsi oblast is a striking example of ethnocontact and polyethnic region, in which Ukrainians, Romanians, Moldovans, Jews, Russians, Poles, Armenians and other ethnic groups created and continue to create their cultural heritage. Ukrainians in the region own 152 museums, Romanians – 12, Moldovans – 14, Russians – 1. Also, separate exhibitions are dedicated to the Jewish, Polish, German, Armenian and other ethnic groups. Of course, such differences in the ethnicity of museums, as an important component of ethnocultural development of the region, are of great practical and scientific importance. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a detailed classification of museums and their typology, as well as in identifying the place of museums in the ethnocultural development of the polyethnic region. These studies should be conducted in other regions of our country. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of finding investments to increase the tourist attractiveness of both individual administrative units and the region as a whole. Museums also play an important role in shaping the ethnic, historical, ethnocultural, national-patriotic and other perceptions of the territory and identity of their people.