MPI队列使用对消息延迟的影响

K. Underwood, R. Brightwell
{"title":"MPI队列使用对消息延迟的影响","authors":"K. Underwood, R. Brightwell","doi":"10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that traditional microbenchmarks do not fully capture the salient architectural features that impact application performance. Even worse, microbenchmarks that target MPI and the communications subsystem do not accurately represent the way that applications use MPI. For example, traditional MPI latency benchmarks time a ping-pong communication with one send and one receive on each of two nodes. The time to post the receive is never counted as part of the latency. This scenario is not even marginally representative of most applications. Two new microbenchmarks are presented here that analyze network latency in a way that more realistically represents the way that MPI is typically used. These benchmarks are used to evaluate modern high-performance networks, including Quadrics, InfiniBand, and Myrinet.","PeriodicalId":106240,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2004. ICPP 2004.","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of MPI queue usage on message latency\",\"authors\":\"K. Underwood, R. Brightwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that traditional microbenchmarks do not fully capture the salient architectural features that impact application performance. Even worse, microbenchmarks that target MPI and the communications subsystem do not accurately represent the way that applications use MPI. For example, traditional MPI latency benchmarks time a ping-pong communication with one send and one receive on each of two nodes. The time to post the receive is never counted as part of the latency. This scenario is not even marginally representative of most applications. Two new microbenchmarks are presented here that analyze network latency in a way that more realistically represents the way that MPI is typically used. These benchmarks are used to evaluate modern high-performance networks, including Quadrics, InfiniBand, and Myrinet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2004. ICPP 2004.\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2004. ICPP 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2004. ICPP 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

众所周知,传统的微基准测试并不能完全捕捉到影响应用程序性能的显著体系结构特性。更糟糕的是,针对MPI和通信子系统的微基准测试并不能准确地表示应用程序使用MPI的方式。例如,传统的MPI延迟基准测试对两个节点上各有一个发送和一个接收的乒乓通信进行计时。发送接收的时间永远不会被计算为延迟的一部分。这个场景甚至不能代表大多数应用程序。本文介绍了两个新的微基准测试,它们以一种更真实地表示MPI通常使用方式的方式分析网络延迟。这些基准测试用于评估现代高性能网络,包括Quadrics、InfiniBand和Myrinet。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of MPI queue usage on message latency
It is well known that traditional microbenchmarks do not fully capture the salient architectural features that impact application performance. Even worse, microbenchmarks that target MPI and the communications subsystem do not accurately represent the way that applications use MPI. For example, traditional MPI latency benchmarks time a ping-pong communication with one send and one receive on each of two nodes. The time to post the receive is never counted as part of the latency. This scenario is not even marginally representative of most applications. Two new microbenchmarks are presented here that analyze network latency in a way that more realistically represents the way that MPI is typically used. These benchmarks are used to evaluate modern high-performance networks, including Quadrics, InfiniBand, and Myrinet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信