OpenSSL与Linux内核漏洞实证分析

Matthieu Jimenez, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon
{"title":"OpenSSL与Linux内核漏洞实证分析","authors":"Matthieu Jimenez, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2016.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vulnerabilities are one of the main concerns faced by practitioners when working with security critical applications. Unfortunately, developers and security teams, even experienced ones, fail to identify many of them with severe consequences. Vulnerabilities are hard to discover since they appear in various forms, caused by many different issues and their identification requires an attacker's mindset. In this paper, we aim at increasing the understanding of vulnerabilities by investigating their characteristics on two major open-source software systems, i.e., the Linux kernel and OpenSSL. In particular, we seek to analyse and build a profile for vulnerable code, which can ultimately help researchers in building automated approaches like vulnerability prediction models. Thus, we examine the location, criticality and category of vulnerable code along with its relation with software metrics. To do so, we collect more than 2,200 vulnerable files accounting for 863 vulnerabilities and compute more than 35 software metrics. Our results indicate that while 9 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types of vulnerabilities are prevalent, only 3 of them are critical in OpenSSL and 2 of them in the Linux kernel. They also indicate that different types of vulnerabilities have different characteristics, i.e., metric profiles, and that vulnerabilities of the same type have different profiles in the two projects we examined. We also found that the file structure of the projects can provide useful information related to the vulnerabilities. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for making project specific approaches that focus on specific types of vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":339123,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL and the Linux Kernel\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Jimenez, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2016.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vulnerabilities are one of the main concerns faced by practitioners when working with security critical applications. Unfortunately, developers and security teams, even experienced ones, fail to identify many of them with severe consequences. Vulnerabilities are hard to discover since they appear in various forms, caused by many different issues and their identification requires an attacker's mindset. In this paper, we aim at increasing the understanding of vulnerabilities by investigating their characteristics on two major open-source software systems, i.e., the Linux kernel and OpenSSL. In particular, we seek to analyse and build a profile for vulnerable code, which can ultimately help researchers in building automated approaches like vulnerability prediction models. Thus, we examine the location, criticality and category of vulnerable code along with its relation with software metrics. To do so, we collect more than 2,200 vulnerable files accounting for 863 vulnerabilities and compute more than 35 software metrics. Our results indicate that while 9 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types of vulnerabilities are prevalent, only 3 of them are critical in OpenSSL and 2 of them in the Linux kernel. They also indicate that different types of vulnerabilities have different characteristics, i.e., metric profiles, and that vulnerabilities of the same type have different profiles in the two projects we examined. We also found that the file structure of the projects can provide useful information related to the vulnerabilities. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for making project specific approaches that focus on specific types of vulnerabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

漏洞是从业人员在处理安全关键型应用程序时所面临的主要问题之一。不幸的是,开发人员和安全团队,即使是经验丰富的开发人员,也未能识别出其中的许多严重后果。漏洞很难被发现,因为它们以各种形式出现,由许多不同的问题引起,并且它们的识别需要攻击者的心态。在本文中,我们旨在通过研究两大开源软件系统(即Linux内核和OpenSSL)上的漏洞特征来增加对漏洞的理解。特别是,我们寻求分析和构建易受攻击代码的配置文件,这最终可以帮助研究人员构建自动化方法,如漏洞预测模型。因此,我们研究了易受攻击代码的位置、严重性和类别,以及它与软件度量的关系。为此,我们收集了超过2,200个易受攻击的文件,涉及863个漏洞,并计算了超过35个软件指标。我们的结果表明,虽然9种常见弱点枚举(Common Weakness Enumeration, CWE)类型的漏洞很普遍,但其中只有3种在OpenSSL中是关键的,其中2种在Linux内核中是关键的。它们还指出,不同类型的漏洞具有不同的特征,即度量概要文件,并且在我们检查的两个项目中,相同类型的漏洞具有不同的概要文件。我们还发现,项目的文件结构可以提供与漏洞相关的有用信息。总的来说,我们的结果表明需要制定针对特定类型漏洞的项目特定方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL and the Linux Kernel
Vulnerabilities are one of the main concerns faced by practitioners when working with security critical applications. Unfortunately, developers and security teams, even experienced ones, fail to identify many of them with severe consequences. Vulnerabilities are hard to discover since they appear in various forms, caused by many different issues and their identification requires an attacker's mindset. In this paper, we aim at increasing the understanding of vulnerabilities by investigating their characteristics on two major open-source software systems, i.e., the Linux kernel and OpenSSL. In particular, we seek to analyse and build a profile for vulnerable code, which can ultimately help researchers in building automated approaches like vulnerability prediction models. Thus, we examine the location, criticality and category of vulnerable code along with its relation with software metrics. To do so, we collect more than 2,200 vulnerable files accounting for 863 vulnerabilities and compute more than 35 software metrics. Our results indicate that while 9 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types of vulnerabilities are prevalent, only 3 of them are critical in OpenSSL and 2 of them in the Linux kernel. They also indicate that different types of vulnerabilities have different characteristics, i.e., metric profiles, and that vulnerabilities of the same type have different profiles in the two projects we examined. We also found that the file structure of the projects can provide useful information related to the vulnerabilities. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for making project specific approaches that focus on specific types of vulnerabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信