格拉什医科大学医务人员严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗体血清阳性率评估

Mohammad Jafari, A. Jabrodini, Sedigheh Yeganeh, Fouziyeh Faraji, Mohammad-Rafi Bazrafshan, Rouhollah Rouhandeh, A. Salmani
{"title":"格拉什医科大学医务人员严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗体血清阳性率评估","authors":"Mohammad Jafari, A. Jabrodini, Sedigheh Yeganeh, Fouziyeh Faraji, Mohammad-Rafi Bazrafshan, Rouhollah Rouhandeh, A. Salmani","doi":"10.5812/zjrms-130094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In late 2019, a new virus spread in China that led to an acute respiratory disease by lung involvement. The virus spread over time and affected many countries, including Iran. Hospital staff are also at high risk of being infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of IgG class antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers and to compare the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ward staff with other hospital wards. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on medical staff at Gerash University of Medical Sciences. After sampling the participants in this study, the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was evaluated using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Demographic and other necessary information about patients were also recorded. Results: Out of 323 staff participating in this study, 130 (40.24%) were in inpatient wards [of which 26 (20%) were in the COVID-19 ward], 55 (17.02%) were in paraclinical wards, and 138 (42.72%) were in administrative wards. A total of 44 (13.6%) patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of antibodies between the three groups, but a significantly higher prevalence of antibodies was observed in the COVID-19 ward subgroup with 6 (23%) positive antibody tests, compared to other wards (P-value = 0.023). Conclusions: Due to the higher prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in staff working in the COVID-19 ward than in other wards, more attention should be paid to health protocols and also emphasis on completing vaccination and monitoring the safety level of staff working in the COVID-19 ward.","PeriodicalId":292747,"journal":{"name":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Seroprevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibodies in Medical and Administrative Staff at Gerash University of Medical Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Jafari, A. Jabrodini, Sedigheh Yeganeh, Fouziyeh Faraji, Mohammad-Rafi Bazrafshan, Rouhollah Rouhandeh, A. Salmani\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/zjrms-130094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In late 2019, a new virus spread in China that led to an acute respiratory disease by lung involvement. The virus spread over time and affected many countries, including Iran. Hospital staff are also at high risk of being infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of IgG class antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers and to compare the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ward staff with other hospital wards. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on medical staff at Gerash University of Medical Sciences. After sampling the participants in this study, the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was evaluated using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Demographic and other necessary information about patients were also recorded. Results: Out of 323 staff participating in this study, 130 (40.24%) were in inpatient wards [of which 26 (20%) were in the COVID-19 ward], 55 (17.02%) were in paraclinical wards, and 138 (42.72%) were in administrative wards. A total of 44 (13.6%) patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of antibodies between the three groups, but a significantly higher prevalence of antibodies was observed in the COVID-19 ward subgroup with 6 (23%) positive antibody tests, compared to other wards (P-value = 0.023). Conclusions: Due to the higher prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in staff working in the COVID-19 ward than in other wards, more attention should be paid to health protocols and also emphasis on completing vaccination and monitoring the safety level of staff working in the COVID-19 ward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-130094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-130094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年底,一种新型病毒在中国传播,导致肺部受累急性呼吸道疾病。该病毒随着时间的推移而传播,影响了包括伊朗在内的许多国家。医院工作人员感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的风险也很高。目的:本研究旨在评估医护人员血清抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG类抗体的阳性率,并比较2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病房工作人员与其他医院病房工作人员感染SARS-CoV-2的风险。方法:对格拉什医科大学医务人员进行横断面研究。在本研究的参与者取样后,使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)方法评估抗sars - cov -2 IgG抗体的产生。还记录了患者的人口统计和其他必要信息。结果:参与本研究的323名工作人员中,住院病房130人(40.24%),其中新冠肺炎病房26人(20%),副临床病房55人(17.02%),行政病房138人(42.72%)。共有44例(13.6%)患者具有抗sars - cov -2 IgG抗体。三组间抗体阳性率差异无统计学意义,但COVID-19病区亚组抗体阳性率明显高于其他病区,抗体阳性率为6例(23%)(p值= 0.023)。结论:由于新冠肺炎病区工作人员抗sars - cov -2 IgG抗体的流行率高于其他病区,应更加重视卫生规程,并重视完成疫苗接种和监测新冠肺炎病区工作人员的安全水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Seroprevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibodies in Medical and Administrative Staff at Gerash University of Medical Sciences
Background: In late 2019, a new virus spread in China that led to an acute respiratory disease by lung involvement. The virus spread over time and affected many countries, including Iran. Hospital staff are also at high risk of being infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of IgG class antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers and to compare the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ward staff with other hospital wards. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on medical staff at Gerash University of Medical Sciences. After sampling the participants in this study, the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was evaluated using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Demographic and other necessary information about patients were also recorded. Results: Out of 323 staff participating in this study, 130 (40.24%) were in inpatient wards [of which 26 (20%) were in the COVID-19 ward], 55 (17.02%) were in paraclinical wards, and 138 (42.72%) were in administrative wards. A total of 44 (13.6%) patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of antibodies between the three groups, but a significantly higher prevalence of antibodies was observed in the COVID-19 ward subgroup with 6 (23%) positive antibody tests, compared to other wards (P-value = 0.023). Conclusions: Due to the higher prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in staff working in the COVID-19 ward than in other wards, more attention should be paid to health protocols and also emphasis on completing vaccination and monitoring the safety level of staff working in the COVID-19 ward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信