使用3D打印技术定制人工骨瓣颅骨成形术的临床效果

J. Lee, Y. Shim, Sung-Tae Kim, W. Lee, K. Lee, S. Paeng, S. Pyo
{"title":"使用3D打印技术定制人工骨瓣颅骨成形术的临床效果","authors":"J. Lee, Y. Shim, Sung-Tae Kim, W. Lee, K. Lee, S. Paeng, S. Pyo","doi":"10.32587/jnic.2021.00388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cranioplasty is required to restore the appearance of the skull, Objective To analyze the outcomes of using a customized artificial skull bone flap made with a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique for cranioplasty and compare them with those of the autobone technique. Method Between December 2018 and February 2020, 24 cranioplasties were performed for 24 hemispheres using a customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing. Simultaneously, 19 cranioplasties for 19 hemispheres were performed using an autobone. Three patients underwent cranioplasty using both a customized artificial bone flap and autobone for each hemisphere. Patient’s demographics, reason for craniectomy, interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, surface area of the skull defect and bone flap, bone flap coverage of the defect, cranioplasty-related factors, and clinical outcome were assessed. Results Forty patients who underwent cranioplasty (bone flap, 21; autobone flap, 16; and artificial bone/ autobone flaps, 3) were enrolled. The artificial bone flap covered more skull defects than the autobone flap (98.6% vs. 90.9%, p=0.000). There were two and six operation-related complications in the artificial bone flap and autobone flap groups, respectively (P=0.061). The subtemporal area was completely covered in the artificial bone flap group. Two patients had an infection of the autobone flap and had it replaced by a 3D printing flap. No patient showed a reduction in the modified Rankin Scale score after surgery, and the clinical course was confirmed to have improved. Conclusions Cranioplasty using customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing technique was effective for covering the skull defect and tends to have a low complication rate compared to the autobone.","PeriodicalId":356321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Cranioplasty Using a Customized Artificial Bone Flap Made by a 3D Printing Technique\",\"authors\":\"J. Lee, Y. Shim, Sung-Tae Kim, W. Lee, K. Lee, S. Paeng, S. Pyo\",\"doi\":\"10.32587/jnic.2021.00388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cranioplasty is required to restore the appearance of the skull, Objective To analyze the outcomes of using a customized artificial skull bone flap made with a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique for cranioplasty and compare them with those of the autobone technique. Method Between December 2018 and February 2020, 24 cranioplasties were performed for 24 hemispheres using a customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing. Simultaneously, 19 cranioplasties for 19 hemispheres were performed using an autobone. Three patients underwent cranioplasty using both a customized artificial bone flap and autobone for each hemisphere. Patient’s demographics, reason for craniectomy, interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, surface area of the skull defect and bone flap, bone flap coverage of the defect, cranioplasty-related factors, and clinical outcome were assessed. Results Forty patients who underwent cranioplasty (bone flap, 21; autobone flap, 16; and artificial bone/ autobone flaps, 3) were enrolled. The artificial bone flap covered more skull defects than the autobone flap (98.6% vs. 90.9%, p=0.000). There were two and six operation-related complications in the artificial bone flap and autobone flap groups, respectively (P=0.061). The subtemporal area was completely covered in the artificial bone flap group. Two patients had an infection of the autobone flap and had it replaced by a 3D printing flap. No patient showed a reduction in the modified Rankin Scale score after surgery, and the clinical course was confirmed to have improved. Conclusions Cranioplasty using customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing technique was effective for covering the skull defect and tends to have a low complication rate compared to the autobone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurointensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2021.00388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2021.00388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析三维打印技术定制人工颅骨瓣颅骨成形术的效果,并与自体骨成形术进行比较。方法于2018年12月至2020年2月,采用3D打印定制的人工骨瓣对24个半球进行了24例颅骨成形术。同时,使用自体骨对19个半球进行了19个颅骨成形术。三名患者接受了颅骨成形术,每个半球使用定制的人工骨瓣和自体骨。评估患者的人口统计学特征、开颅原因、开颅与颅骨成形术之间的间隔、颅骨缺损和骨瓣的表面积、缺损的骨瓣覆盖、颅骨成形术相关因素和临床结果。结果行颅骨成形术40例(骨瓣21例;Autobone皮瓣,16;人工骨/汽车骨瓣,3个)。人工骨瓣修复颅骨缺损的比例高于自体骨瓣(98.6%比90.9%,p=0.000)。人工骨瓣组术后并发症2例,自体骨瓣组术后并发症6例(P=0.061)。人工骨瓣组颞下区完全覆盖。两名患者的自体骨瓣感染,并将其替换为3D打印瓣。术后无患者改良Rankin量表评分下降,临床病程得到改善。结论3D打印定制人工骨瓣颅骨成形术可有效覆盖颅骨缺损,与自体骨相比,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of Cranioplasty Using a Customized Artificial Bone Flap Made by a 3D Printing Technique
Cranioplasty is required to restore the appearance of the skull, Objective To analyze the outcomes of using a customized artificial skull bone flap made with a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique for cranioplasty and compare them with those of the autobone technique. Method Between December 2018 and February 2020, 24 cranioplasties were performed for 24 hemispheres using a customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing. Simultaneously, 19 cranioplasties for 19 hemispheres were performed using an autobone. Three patients underwent cranioplasty using both a customized artificial bone flap and autobone for each hemisphere. Patient’s demographics, reason for craniectomy, interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, surface area of the skull defect and bone flap, bone flap coverage of the defect, cranioplasty-related factors, and clinical outcome were assessed. Results Forty patients who underwent cranioplasty (bone flap, 21; autobone flap, 16; and artificial bone/ autobone flaps, 3) were enrolled. The artificial bone flap covered more skull defects than the autobone flap (98.6% vs. 90.9%, p=0.000). There were two and six operation-related complications in the artificial bone flap and autobone flap groups, respectively (P=0.061). The subtemporal area was completely covered in the artificial bone flap group. Two patients had an infection of the autobone flap and had it replaced by a 3D printing flap. No patient showed a reduction in the modified Rankin Scale score after surgery, and the clinical course was confirmed to have improved. Conclusions Cranioplasty using customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing technique was effective for covering the skull defect and tends to have a low complication rate compared to the autobone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信