Vincentas Lamanauskas, Dalia Augienė
{"title":"GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS PRADINĖJE MOKYKLOJE: PROCESAS IR JO GERINIMAS","authors":"Vincentas Lamanauskas, Dalia Augienė","doi":"10.48127/gu/21.27.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that science education (SE) in primary school is integrated, it must be of high quality. In other words, primary school students should be able to perform simple observations and tests, formulate conclusions, use the simplest devices and instruments, and so on.\nThe same universal questions remain, such as What do young people need to know and understand? why is it important? What are the most effective ways of teaching science at different levels of the school system? What knowledge and skills do teachers need? In Lithuanian primary school (1-4 grades), science education is mainly implemented through World Cognition lessons and includes two goals that are very important for the student's socialization and education: to help the child get to know nature and its processes and to ensure appropriate (positive) student socialization.\nAlthough teachers tend to demonstrate a variety of experiments, student research activities are not predominant. A similar situation is observed with regard to the use of technology in the educational process. The readiness of teachers to organize and implement science education in primary school is quite uneven/diverse. \nThus, the main aim of this study was to analyse the position of primary school teachers on the issue of science education, i.e., to determine which ways of improving science education one sees, and which methods of activity in the process of science education are most appropriate, how student research activities are carried out in the SE process. \nA quantitative study using a survey strategy was conducted. In-service primary school teachers from various Lithuanian primary schools participated in the study. A total of 115 teachers from more than 30 Lithuanian schools participated. \nTeachers use a variety of methods in their science education. The most frequently used are the involvement of students in practical work (activities), demonstration of experiments, attempts to link science content with the daily life of students, to organize group work of students. Class discussions are much less often encouraged, and students are allowed to carry out independent research (experiments). The aim is rarely to incorporate technology, to encourage (facilitate) research, to meet (take into account) the individual differences of students.\n In the process of primary science education, the most common research with students is related to a healthy lifestyle, environmental protection, and ecology. Less often, students do research on vegetation (flora), fauna (fauna), physical phenomena. Very rarely students do research on agriculture / the effects of chemicals on plants and animals. Students rarely explore soil, minerals, and rocks.\n Teachers argue that science education in primary school could be improved with more resources / equipment, etc., by including more practical work (activities) in an effort to bring science content closer to students' daily lives, with more student-centred lessons, better access to technology and their use in reducing the number of students in the classroom. Some teachers point out that it is important to devote more time to the selection and analysis of science content, etc., to the preparation of lessons and to have more opportunities for the professional development of teachers.\nKeywords: professional development, primary school, practical activities, science education","PeriodicalId":339631,"journal":{"name":"Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School (NSECS)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School (NSECS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48127/gu/21.27.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

小学科学教育虽然是综合教育,但必须是高质量的综合教育。换句话说,小学生应该能够进行简单的观察和测试,得出结论,使用最简单的设备和仪器,等等。同样的普遍问题仍然存在,比如年轻人需要知道和理解什么?为什么它很重要?在不同层次的学校系统中,最有效的科学教学方法是什么?教师需要哪些知识和技能?在立陶宛小学(1-4年级),科学教育主要通过世界认知课来实施,包括两个对学生的社会化和教育非常重要的目标:帮助孩子了解自然及其过程,确保适当的(积极的)学生社会化。虽然教师倾向于演示各种实验,但学生的研究活动并不占主导地位。在教育过程中使用技术方面也出现了类似的情况。小学教师组织和实施科学教育的意愿参差不齐。因此,本研究的主要目的是分析小学教师在科学教育问题上的立场,即确定人们认为哪些方法可以改善科学教育,科学教育过程中的哪些活动方法最合适,学生研究活动如何在SE过程中进行。采用调查策略进行了定量研究。立陶宛各小学的在职小学教师参与了这项研究。来自30多所立陶宛学校的115名教师参加了这次活动。教师在科学教育中使用多种方法。最常用的是让学生参与实际工作(活动),演示实验,尝试将科学内容与学生的日常生活联系起来,组织学生的小组工作。课堂讨论很少被鼓励,并且允许学生进行独立的研究(实验)。其目的很少是结合技术,鼓励(促进)研究,满足(考虑)学生的个体差异。在小学科学教育过程中,学生最常进行的研究与健康的生活方式、环境保护和生态有关。较少的情况下,学生们会研究植被(flora)、动物群(fauna)和物理现象。很少有学生研究农业/化学物质对动植物的影响。学生很少探索土壤、矿物和岩石。教师们认为,小学的科学教育可以通过更多的资源/设备等得到改善,包括更多的实际工作(活动),努力使科学内容更接近学生的日常生活,更多的以学生为中心的课程,更好地获得技术和利用它们来减少教室里的学生人数。一些教师指出,重要的是要把更多的时间花在科学内容的选择和分析等方面,花在备课上,给教师更多的专业发展机会。关键词:专业发展,小学,实践活动,科学教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS PRADINĖJE MOKYKLOJE: PROCESAS IR JO GERINIMAS
Despite the fact that science education (SE) in primary school is integrated, it must be of high quality. In other words, primary school students should be able to perform simple observations and tests, formulate conclusions, use the simplest devices and instruments, and so on. The same universal questions remain, such as What do young people need to know and understand? why is it important? What are the most effective ways of teaching science at different levels of the school system? What knowledge and skills do teachers need? In Lithuanian primary school (1-4 grades), science education is mainly implemented through World Cognition lessons and includes two goals that are very important for the student's socialization and education: to help the child get to know nature and its processes and to ensure appropriate (positive) student socialization. Although teachers tend to demonstrate a variety of experiments, student research activities are not predominant. A similar situation is observed with regard to the use of technology in the educational process. The readiness of teachers to organize and implement science education in primary school is quite uneven/diverse. Thus, the main aim of this study was to analyse the position of primary school teachers on the issue of science education, i.e., to determine which ways of improving science education one sees, and which methods of activity in the process of science education are most appropriate, how student research activities are carried out in the SE process. A quantitative study using a survey strategy was conducted. In-service primary school teachers from various Lithuanian primary schools participated in the study. A total of 115 teachers from more than 30 Lithuanian schools participated. Teachers use a variety of methods in their science education. The most frequently used are the involvement of students in practical work (activities), demonstration of experiments, attempts to link science content with the daily life of students, to organize group work of students. Class discussions are much less often encouraged, and students are allowed to carry out independent research (experiments). The aim is rarely to incorporate technology, to encourage (facilitate) research, to meet (take into account) the individual differences of students. In the process of primary science education, the most common research with students is related to a healthy lifestyle, environmental protection, and ecology. Less often, students do research on vegetation (flora), fauna (fauna), physical phenomena. Very rarely students do research on agriculture / the effects of chemicals on plants and animals. Students rarely explore soil, minerals, and rocks. Teachers argue that science education in primary school could be improved with more resources / equipment, etc., by including more practical work (activities) in an effort to bring science content closer to students' daily lives, with more student-centred lessons, better access to technology and their use in reducing the number of students in the classroom. Some teachers point out that it is important to devote more time to the selection and analysis of science content, etc., to the preparation of lessons and to have more opportunities for the professional development of teachers. Keywords: professional development, primary school, practical activities, science education
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信