Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen
{"title":"芬兰技术教育当前和未来的趋势和问题——参与一项国际德尔菲研究","authors":"Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen","doi":"10.15663/ajte.v8i.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.","PeriodicalId":170728,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current and future trends and issues facing technology education in Finland—Taking part in an international Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen\",\"doi\":\"10.15663/ajte.v8i.88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v8i.88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v8i.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current and future trends and issues facing technology education in Finland—Taking part in an international Delphi study
This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.