芬兰技术教育当前和未来的趋势和问题——参与一项国际德尔菲研究

Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen
{"title":"芬兰技术教育当前和未来的趋势和问题——参与一项国际德尔菲研究","authors":"Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen","doi":"10.15663/ajte.v8i.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.","PeriodicalId":170728,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current and future trends and issues facing technology education in Finland—Taking part in an international Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Niiranen, P. Ikonen, Timo Rissanen, Aki Rasinen\",\"doi\":\"10.15663/ajte.v8i.88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v8i.88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v8i.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究是一项国际研究合作的一部分,旨在确定比利时、芬兰、日本和美国技术教育的当前和未来趋势和问题。从2019年11月至2020年4月,采用三轮德尔菲法向芬兰的技术教育利益相关者征求信息。专家小组(N=31)由技术教育教师、教育工作者、国家LUMA (STEM) 2020计划的研究人员和专家以及技术教育开发者组成。在德尔菲过程中,定量和定性方法都被用于收集信息和分析结果。在本文中,重点是比较第三轮之后工艺和技术教育专业人员确定的最相关的趋势和问题。采用定性内容分析法对数据进行分析。这些发现揭示了芬兰技术教育的不明确作用,以及在国家课程水平上对其进行明确定义的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current and future trends and issues facing technology education in Finland—Taking part in an international Delphi study
This study is part of an international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium, Finland, Japan and the USA. The three-round Delphi method was utilised to solicit information from technology education stakeholders in Finland from November 2019 to April 2020. The panel of experts (N=31) comprised technology education teacher educators, researchers and experts of the national LUMA (STEM) 2020 programme and technology education developers. During the Delphi process both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized in gathering information and analysing the findings. In this article the focus is on comparing the most relevant trends and issues identified by craft and technology education professionals after Round 3. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. These findings reveal the unclear role of technology education in Finland and the need for a clear definition for it on the national curriculum level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信