支持最终用户理解分类错误

Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, J. Doorn, L. Hardman
{"title":"支持最终用户理解分类错误","authors":"Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, J. Doorn, L. Hardman","doi":"10.1145/3232078.3232096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classifiers are applied in many domains where classification errors have significant implications. However, end-users may not always understand the errors and their impact, as error visualizations are typically designed for experts and for improving classifiers. We discuss a visualization design that addresses the specific needs of classifiers' end-users. We evaluate this design with users from three levels of expertise, and compare it with ROC curves and confusion matrices. We identify key difficulties with understanding the classification errors, and how visualization designs addressed or aggravated them. The main issues concerned confusions of the actual and predicted classes (e.g., confusion of False Positives and False Negatives). The machine learning terminology, complexity of ROC curves, and symmetry of confusion matrices aggravated the confusions. The end-user-oriented visualization reduced the difficulties by using several visual features to clarify the actual and predicted classes, and more tangible metrics and representation. Our results contribute to supporting end-users' understanding of classification errors, and informed decisions when choosing or tuning classifiers.","PeriodicalId":263115,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting End-User Understanding of Classification Errors\",\"authors\":\"Emma Beauxis-Aussalet, J. Doorn, L. Hardman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3232078.3232096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classifiers are applied in many domains where classification errors have significant implications. However, end-users may not always understand the errors and their impact, as error visualizations are typically designed for experts and for improving classifiers. We discuss a visualization design that addresses the specific needs of classifiers' end-users. We evaluate this design with users from three levels of expertise, and compare it with ROC curves and confusion matrices. We identify key difficulties with understanding the classification errors, and how visualization designs addressed or aggravated them. The main issues concerned confusions of the actual and predicted classes (e.g., confusion of False Positives and False Negatives). The machine learning terminology, complexity of ROC curves, and symmetry of confusion matrices aggravated the confusions. The end-user-oriented visualization reduced the difficulties by using several visual features to clarify the actual and predicted classes, and more tangible metrics and representation. Our results contribute to supporting end-users' understanding of classification errors, and informed decisions when choosing or tuning classifiers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3232078.3232096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3232078.3232096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

分类器被应用于许多分类错误会产生重大影响的领域。然而,最终用户可能并不总是理解错误及其影响,因为错误可视化通常是为专家和改进分类器而设计的。我们讨论了一种可视化设计,以满足分类器最终用户的特定需求。我们从三个专业水平的用户评估这个设计,并将其与ROC曲线和混淆矩阵进行比较。我们确定了理解分类错误的关键困难,以及可视化设计如何解决或加剧它们。主要问题是混淆了实际和预测的类别(例如,混淆了假阳性和假阴性)。机器学习术语、ROC曲线的复杂性和混淆矩阵的对称性加剧了混淆。面向最终用户的可视化通过使用几个可视化特征来澄清实际的和预测的类,以及更有形的度量和表示,减少了困难。我们的结果有助于支持最终用户对分类错误的理解,并在选择或调优分类器时做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting End-User Understanding of Classification Errors
Classifiers are applied in many domains where classification errors have significant implications. However, end-users may not always understand the errors and their impact, as error visualizations are typically designed for experts and for improving classifiers. We discuss a visualization design that addresses the specific needs of classifiers' end-users. We evaluate this design with users from three levels of expertise, and compare it with ROC curves and confusion matrices. We identify key difficulties with understanding the classification errors, and how visualization designs addressed or aggravated them. The main issues concerned confusions of the actual and predicted classes (e.g., confusion of False Positives and False Negatives). The machine learning terminology, complexity of ROC curves, and symmetry of confusion matrices aggravated the confusions. The end-user-oriented visualization reduced the difficulties by using several visual features to clarify the actual and predicted classes, and more tangible metrics and representation. Our results contribute to supporting end-users' understanding of classification errors, and informed decisions when choosing or tuning classifiers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信