萘普生相关胃十二指肠毒性:肠包衣颗粒与普通片剂。

L Aabakken, M Ugstad, O N Gamst, R Winther, M Osnes
{"title":"萘普生相关胃十二指肠毒性:肠包衣颗粒与普通片剂。","authors":"L Aabakken,&nbsp;M Ugstad,&nbsp;O N Gamst,&nbsp;R Winther,&nbsp;M Osnes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two naproxen formulations were compared with regard to gastroduodenal endoscopic findings. Using a dose of 500 mg bid for one week, plain tablets were compared to enteric coated granules in a gelatine capsule in a randomized, cross over, double-blind, double dummy study in 16 healthy, male volunteers. Endoscopic evaluation revealed no difference between the two formulations. Since previous studies with enteric coated naproxen tablets indicated a favourable side effect profile compared to plain tablets, the present data indicates that enteric coated formulations are not all alike, and should be studied individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"12 2","pages":"43-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naproxen-associated gastroduodenal toxicity: enteric coated granules versus plain tablets.\",\"authors\":\"L Aabakken,&nbsp;M Ugstad,&nbsp;O N Gamst,&nbsp;R Winther,&nbsp;M Osnes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two naproxen formulations were compared with regard to gastroduodenal endoscopic findings. Using a dose of 500 mg bid for one week, plain tablets were compared to enteric coated granules in a gelatine capsule in a randomized, cross over, double-blind, double dummy study in 16 healthy, male volunteers. Endoscopic evaluation revealed no difference between the two formulations. Since previous studies with enteric coated naproxen tablets indicated a favourable side effect profile compared to plain tablets, the present data indicates that enteric coated formulations are not all alike, and should be studied individually.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"43-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较两种萘普生配方的胃十二指肠内镜检查结果。在一项随机、交叉、双盲、双虚拟研究中,16名健康男性志愿者使用500毫克的剂量,为期一周,将普通片剂与明胶胶囊中的肠溶颗粒进行比较。内镜评估显示两种配方之间没有差异。由于先前对肠溶萘普生片剂的研究表明,与普通片剂相比,肠溶萘普生片剂的副作用更大,因此目前的数据表明,肠溶萘普生片剂并非都是相同的,应该单独研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Naproxen-associated gastroduodenal toxicity: enteric coated granules versus plain tablets.

Two naproxen formulations were compared with regard to gastroduodenal endoscopic findings. Using a dose of 500 mg bid for one week, plain tablets were compared to enteric coated granules in a gelatine capsule in a randomized, cross over, double-blind, double dummy study in 16 healthy, male volunteers. Endoscopic evaluation revealed no difference between the two formulations. Since previous studies with enteric coated naproxen tablets indicated a favourable side effect profile compared to plain tablets, the present data indicates that enteric coated formulations are not all alike, and should be studied individually.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信