{"title":"有(无)公平的选择?大流行时期儿童返校的家庭决策","authors":"Robert Cotto, Sarah L. Woulfin","doi":"10.53956/jfde.2021.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, most schools across the country closed in-person instruction for a period of time and many shifted to online schooling. Beginning in fall 2020, schools around the United States began reopening and many districts offered families a decision or “choice” to return their children to an in-person or online schooling experience. In many cities, this approach complicated existing school choice and permanent closure policies with already existing equity issues. Building upon previous scholarship on school choice and closure, this study draws on the concept of school choice with(out) equity (Frankenberg et al., 2010; Scott & Stuart Wells, 2013; Horsford et al., 2019). Using data from an online survey (n = 155 participants) in August 2020, this study examines why families (50% white, 50% people of color) decided to return their children to in-person schooling in Hartford, Connecticut. This study uses a mixed-method analysis of qualitative responses and quantitative data to understand family decisions to return to in-person schooling (Creswell, 2014). Rather than school choices with full equity considerations during the pandemic, these family responses focused on needs of childcare for full-time work and health safety. These responses suggest a partial equity in the landscape of available choices. The study raises questions about reapplying old forms of school choice to a new form of temporary school closure during pandemic.","PeriodicalId":184320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Diversity in Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice With(out) Equity? Family Decisions of Child Return to Urban Schools in Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Robert Cotto, Sarah L. Woulfin\",\"doi\":\"10.53956/jfde.2021.159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, most schools across the country closed in-person instruction for a period of time and many shifted to online schooling. Beginning in fall 2020, schools around the United States began reopening and many districts offered families a decision or “choice” to return their children to an in-person or online schooling experience. In many cities, this approach complicated existing school choice and permanent closure policies with already existing equity issues. Building upon previous scholarship on school choice and closure, this study draws on the concept of school choice with(out) equity (Frankenberg et al., 2010; Scott & Stuart Wells, 2013; Horsford et al., 2019). Using data from an online survey (n = 155 participants) in August 2020, this study examines why families (50% white, 50% people of color) decided to return their children to in-person schooling in Hartford, Connecticut. This study uses a mixed-method analysis of qualitative responses and quantitative data to understand family decisions to return to in-person schooling (Creswell, 2014). Rather than school choices with full equity considerations during the pandemic, these family responses focused on needs of childcare for full-time work and health safety. These responses suggest a partial equity in the landscape of available choices. The study raises questions about reapplying old forms of school choice to a new form of temporary school closure during pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Diversity in Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Diversity in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2021.159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Diversity in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2021.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
为应对新冠肺炎全球大流行,全国大多数学校在一段时间内关闭了面对面教学,许多学校转向在线教学。从2020年秋季开始,美国各地的学校开始重新开放,许多地区为家庭提供了一个决定或“选择”,让他们的孩子回到面对面或在线上学的经历中。在许多城市,这种做法使现有的择校和永久关闭政策与已经存在的公平问题复杂化。在之前关于择校和关闭的学术研究的基础上,本研究借鉴了具有(非)公平的择校概念(Frankenberg等人,2010;Scott & Stuart Wells, 2013;Horsford et al., 2019)。这项研究使用了2020年8月在线调查(n = 155名参与者)的数据,研究了为什么康涅狄格州哈特福德的家庭(50%的白人,50%的有色人种)决定让孩子回到面对面的学校上学。本研究采用混合方法分析定性反应和定量数据,以了解家庭决定重返面对面上学(Creswell, 2014)。在大流行期间,这些家庭应对措施侧重于全职工作的儿童保育需求和健康安全,而不是充分考虑公平的学校选择。这些反应表明,在现有选择的格局中存在部分公平。该研究提出了一个问题,即在大流行期间将旧的择校形式重新应用于一种新的临时学校关闭形式。
Choice With(out) Equity? Family Decisions of Child Return to Urban Schools in Pandemic
In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, most schools across the country closed in-person instruction for a period of time and many shifted to online schooling. Beginning in fall 2020, schools around the United States began reopening and many districts offered families a decision or “choice” to return their children to an in-person or online schooling experience. In many cities, this approach complicated existing school choice and permanent closure policies with already existing equity issues. Building upon previous scholarship on school choice and closure, this study draws on the concept of school choice with(out) equity (Frankenberg et al., 2010; Scott & Stuart Wells, 2013; Horsford et al., 2019). Using data from an online survey (n = 155 participants) in August 2020, this study examines why families (50% white, 50% people of color) decided to return their children to in-person schooling in Hartford, Connecticut. This study uses a mixed-method analysis of qualitative responses and quantitative data to understand family decisions to return to in-person schooling (Creswell, 2014). Rather than school choices with full equity considerations during the pandemic, these family responses focused on needs of childcare for full-time work and health safety. These responses suggest a partial equity in the landscape of available choices. The study raises questions about reapplying old forms of school choice to a new form of temporary school closure during pandemic.