droxicam与吲哚美辛治疗类风湿关节炎的双盲随机对照试验。

S Sánchez Andrada, V Rodríguez Valverde
{"title":"droxicam与吲哚美辛治疗类风湿关节炎的双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"S Sánchez Andrada,&nbsp;V Rodríguez Valverde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of droxicam (20mg/day) and that of indomethacin (100mg/day) administered to 20 patients (7 men, 13 women; aged 54.7 +/- 13.2 years) with active classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis during 9 weeks, after a 7-day single-blind run-in paracetamol (1,500mg/day) period. Evaluations were carried out at weeks 0 (washout), 1,2,4,6 and 9. After 9 weeks of treatment, both drugs showed a statistically significant improvement of joint pain intensity, articular index (number of swollen or painful joints and degree of involvement), duration of morning stiffness, functional capacity, and level of fatigue. Inter-treatment differences at all study intervals were not observed. Grip strength improved only in indomethacin-treated patients. Withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic efficacy did not occur. Side effects occurred in four patients from each group. One patient in the indomethacin group withdrew at the week 1 due to epigastric pain and heartburn. In conclusion, droxicam (20mg/day) seems to be as effective as indomethacin (100mg/day) in the alleviation of symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"11 4","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"S Sánchez Andrada,&nbsp;V Rodríguez Valverde\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of droxicam (20mg/day) and that of indomethacin (100mg/day) administered to 20 patients (7 men, 13 women; aged 54.7 +/- 13.2 years) with active classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis during 9 weeks, after a 7-day single-blind run-in paracetamol (1,500mg/day) period. Evaluations were carried out at weeks 0 (washout), 1,2,4,6 and 9. After 9 weeks of treatment, both drugs showed a statistically significant improvement of joint pain intensity, articular index (number of swollen or painful joints and degree of involvement), duration of morning stiffness, functional capacity, and level of fatigue. Inter-treatment differences at all study intervals were not observed. Grip strength improved only in indomethacin-treated patients. Withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic efficacy did not occur. Side effects occurred in four patients from each group. One patient in the indomethacin group withdrew at the week 1 due to epigastric pain and heartburn. In conclusion, droxicam (20mg/day) seems to be as effective as indomethacin (100mg/day) in the alleviation of symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本双盲随机对照试验比较了20例患者(男性7例,女性13例;年龄54.7 +/- 13.2岁),经7天单盲扑热息痛(1500mg /天)治疗后,9周内伴有活动性经典或明确的类风湿性关节炎。在第0周(洗脱期)、第1周、第2周、第4周、第6周和第9周进行评估。治疗9周后,两种药物在关节疼痛强度、关节指数(肿胀或疼痛关节的数量和受累程度)、晨僵持续时间、功能能力和疲劳水平方面均有统计学意义的改善。没有观察到所有研究间隔的处理间差异。只有接受消炎痛治疗的患者握力有所改善。没有发生因缺乏治疗效果而停药的情况。两组各有4例患者出现副作用。吲哚美辛组1例患者在第1周因胃痛和胃灼热退出治疗。总之,在缓解类风湿性关节炎患者的症状方面,droxicam (20mg/天)似乎与吲哚美辛(100mg/天)一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis.

This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of droxicam (20mg/day) and that of indomethacin (100mg/day) administered to 20 patients (7 men, 13 women; aged 54.7 +/- 13.2 years) with active classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis during 9 weeks, after a 7-day single-blind run-in paracetamol (1,500mg/day) period. Evaluations were carried out at weeks 0 (washout), 1,2,4,6 and 9. After 9 weeks of treatment, both drugs showed a statistically significant improvement of joint pain intensity, articular index (number of swollen or painful joints and degree of involvement), duration of morning stiffness, functional capacity, and level of fatigue. Inter-treatment differences at all study intervals were not observed. Grip strength improved only in indomethacin-treated patients. Withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic efficacy did not occur. Side effects occurred in four patients from each group. One patient in the indomethacin group withdrew at the week 1 due to epigastric pain and heartburn. In conclusion, droxicam (20mg/day) seems to be as effective as indomethacin (100mg/day) in the alleviation of symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信