不同几何布局电容式传感器在电缆绝缘劣化检测中的比较分析

Md. Nazmul Al-Imran, M. Ali, S. Glass, L. Fifield
{"title":"不同几何布局电容式传感器在电缆绝缘劣化检测中的比较分析","authors":"Md. Nazmul Al-Imran, M. Ali, S. Glass, L. Fifield","doi":"10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis between Interdigital Capacitor (IDC) sensor and Serpentine Capacitive (SRC) sensor. The effects of electrode layouts on sensor performance are studied by means of finite element simulation where the geometrical dimensions (except electrode length) and material characteristics of both sensors are identical. Conformal IDC and SRC sensors with equal sensor area are modeled on a cable surface. The simulation results show a tradeoff between IDC and SRC sensors in terms of sensitivity and penetration depth. The SRC sensor shows 13.3% increase in sensitivity and 16.8% increase in capacitance compared to the IDC sensor, though the electric field penetration depth of the SRC sensor is 18.8% lower than the IDC sensor. In addition, the effects of change in electrode width, inter-electrode gap, and number of electrodes on SRC and IDC sensor's comparative performance are evaluated.","PeriodicalId":170813,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Capacitive Sensors with Different Geometrical layouts for Cable Insulation Degradation Detection\",\"authors\":\"Md. Nazmul Al-Imran, M. Ali, S. Glass, L. Fifield\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative analysis between Interdigital Capacitor (IDC) sensor and Serpentine Capacitive (SRC) sensor. The effects of electrode layouts on sensor performance are studied by means of finite element simulation where the geometrical dimensions (except electrode length) and material characteristics of both sensors are identical. Conformal IDC and SRC sensors with equal sensor area are modeled on a cable surface. The simulation results show a tradeoff between IDC and SRC sensors in terms of sensitivity and penetration depth. The SRC sensor shows 13.3% increase in sensitivity and 16.8% increase in capacitance compared to the IDC sensor, though the electric field penetration depth of the SRC sensor is 18.8% lower than the IDC sensor. In addition, the effects of change in electrode width, inter-electrode gap, and number of electrodes on SRC and IDC sensor's comparative performance are evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对数字间电容式传感器(IDC)和蛇形电容式传感器(SRC)进行了比较分析。在两种传感器的几何尺寸(电极长度除外)和材料特性相同的情况下,通过有限元模拟研究了电极布局对传感器性能的影响。在电缆表面上对具有等传感器面积的保形IDC和SRC传感器进行建模。仿真结果表明,IDC和SRC传感器在灵敏度和穿透深度方面进行了权衡。SRC传感器的灵敏度比IDC传感器提高了13.3%,电容比IDC传感器提高了16.8%,但电场穿透深度比IDC传感器低18.8%。此外,还评估了电极宽度、电极间隙和电极数量的变化对SRC和IDC传感器比较性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Capacitive Sensors with Different Geometrical layouts for Cable Insulation Degradation Detection
This paper presents a comparative analysis between Interdigital Capacitor (IDC) sensor and Serpentine Capacitive (SRC) sensor. The effects of electrode layouts on sensor performance are studied by means of finite element simulation where the geometrical dimensions (except electrode length) and material characteristics of both sensors are identical. Conformal IDC and SRC sensors with equal sensor area are modeled on a cable surface. The simulation results show a tradeoff between IDC and SRC sensors in terms of sensitivity and penetration depth. The SRC sensor shows 13.3% increase in sensitivity and 16.8% increase in capacitance compared to the IDC sensor, though the electric field penetration depth of the SRC sensor is 18.8% lower than the IDC sensor. In addition, the effects of change in electrode width, inter-electrode gap, and number of electrodes on SRC and IDC sensor's comparative performance are evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信