学生的认知能力水平与传统认知方法

D. N. L. Lubur, Dekriati Ate
{"title":"学生的认知能力水平与传统认知方法","authors":"D. N. L. Lubur, Dekriati Ate","doi":"10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Title: The Level of Thinking Ability of Students with Metacognitive-Discursive Approaches and Conventional Approaches]. This paper discusses the different levels of thinking ability of students in the classroom using metacognitive-discursive and conventional approaches in SMPK St. Aloysius Weetebula. PISA is one of the tests that measure the level of critical thinking skills. The low PISA results of Indonesian students are caused by the weak ability to solve high-level problem problems, the evaluation system in Indonesia that still uses low-level questions, and students are accustomed to obtaining and using formal mathematical knowledge in class. One way to overcome this problem is STKIP Weetebula in collaboration with German misereor to improve the quality of education on the island of Sumba. To achieve this goal, an entrance test was conducted for all 7th-grade students of Aloysius Middle School in 2014 and 2017. In some exercises, there were very high score differences. From this exercise, one of the problems with the highest difference is a fraction. This research is an interpretative study through the analysis of student answers based on theory and descriptive analysis to measure differences in scores obtained by two groups of students. Research results in class with metacognitive-discursive approach 17 (89.47%) answered correctly and 2 (10.53%) of 19 students answered incorrectly, while in class with conventional approach 3 (2.59%) of 116 students answered correctly and 113 (97.41%) of 116 students answered incorrectly. Based on the results of this study concluded that students in the classroom with a metacognitive-discursive approach to learning more than students in other.","PeriodicalId":165148,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Diskursif dan Pendekatan Konvensional\",\"authors\":\"D. N. L. Lubur, Dekriati Ate\",\"doi\":\"10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Title: The Level of Thinking Ability of Students with Metacognitive-Discursive Approaches and Conventional Approaches]. This paper discusses the different levels of thinking ability of students in the classroom using metacognitive-discursive and conventional approaches in SMPK St. Aloysius Weetebula. PISA is one of the tests that measure the level of critical thinking skills. The low PISA results of Indonesian students are caused by the weak ability to solve high-level problem problems, the evaluation system in Indonesia that still uses low-level questions, and students are accustomed to obtaining and using formal mathematical knowledge in class. One way to overcome this problem is STKIP Weetebula in collaboration with German misereor to improve the quality of education on the island of Sumba. To achieve this goal, an entrance test was conducted for all 7th-grade students of Aloysius Middle School in 2014 and 2017. In some exercises, there were very high score differences. From this exercise, one of the problems with the highest difference is a fraction. This research is an interpretative study through the analysis of student answers based on theory and descriptive analysis to measure differences in scores obtained by two groups of students. Research results in class with metacognitive-discursive approach 17 (89.47%) answered correctly and 2 (10.53%) of 19 students answered incorrectly, while in class with conventional approach 3 (2.59%) of 116 students answered correctly and 113 (97.41%) of 116 students answered incorrectly. Based on the results of this study concluded that students in the classroom with a metacognitive-discursive approach to learning more than students in other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

[题目:元认知-话语教学法与传统教学法对学生思维能力水平的影响]。本文运用元认知-话语和传统的教学方法探讨了学生在课堂上的不同思维水平。国际学生评估项目是衡量批判性思维能力水平的测试之一。印尼学生PISA成绩较低的原因是解决高水平问题的能力较弱,印尼的评价体系仍然使用低水平问题,学生习惯于在课堂上获取和使用正式的数学知识。克服这一问题的一种方法是STKIP Weetebula与德国misereor合作,提高松巴岛的教育质量。为了实现这一目标,我们在2014年和2017年对阿洛伊修斯中学的所有七年级学生进行了入学考试。在一些练习中,得分差异非常大。从这个练习中,差异最大的问题之一是分数。本研究是一项解释性研究,通过基于理论的学生答案分析和描述性分析来衡量两组学生得分的差异。研究结果元认知语篇教学法课堂上19名学生中正确回答17名(89.47%),不正确回答2名(10.53%),而传统教学法课堂上116名学生中正确回答3名(2.59%),不正确回答113名(97.41%)。根据本研究的结果得出结论,在课堂上采用元认知-话语方法的学生比在其他课堂上使用元认知-话语方法的学生学习效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Diskursif dan Pendekatan Konvensional
[Title: The Level of Thinking Ability of Students with Metacognitive-Discursive Approaches and Conventional Approaches]. This paper discusses the different levels of thinking ability of students in the classroom using metacognitive-discursive and conventional approaches in SMPK St. Aloysius Weetebula. PISA is one of the tests that measure the level of critical thinking skills. The low PISA results of Indonesian students are caused by the weak ability to solve high-level problem problems, the evaluation system in Indonesia that still uses low-level questions, and students are accustomed to obtaining and using formal mathematical knowledge in class. One way to overcome this problem is STKIP Weetebula in collaboration with German misereor to improve the quality of education on the island of Sumba. To achieve this goal, an entrance test was conducted for all 7th-grade students of Aloysius Middle School in 2014 and 2017. In some exercises, there were very high score differences. From this exercise, one of the problems with the highest difference is a fraction. This research is an interpretative study through the analysis of student answers based on theory and descriptive analysis to measure differences in scores obtained by two groups of students. Research results in class with metacognitive-discursive approach 17 (89.47%) answered correctly and 2 (10.53%) of 19 students answered incorrectly, while in class with conventional approach 3 (2.59%) of 116 students answered correctly and 113 (97.41%) of 116 students answered incorrectly. Based on the results of this study concluded that students in the classroom with a metacognitive-discursive approach to learning more than students in other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信