邀请审查:技术如何侵蚀律师-客户特权

Philip J. Favro
{"title":"邀请审查:技术如何侵蚀律师-客户特权","authors":"Philip J. Favro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2255206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes how digital age technologies and heightened judicial scrutiny are negatively affecting the attorney-client privilege claims of in-house counsel. The article spotlight the factors that are causing technology to negatively impact in-house privilege claims. This includes a discussion regarding the historical basis for increased court scrutiny of such claims. The article also examines how the indiscriminate use of email by corporations has invited the courts to view those claims with even greater skepticism. The article then explores how such skepticism bodes poorly for organizations as they attempt to protect their internal lawyers’ claims from the transparency that social networks, cloud computing, and BYOD provide into their discussions. Finally, the article offers some practical suggestions that can help mitigate the impact of these technological challenges.","PeriodicalId":297424,"journal":{"name":"Richmond Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inviting Scrutiny: How Technologies are Eroding the Attorney-Client Privilege\",\"authors\":\"Philip J. Favro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2255206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes how digital age technologies and heightened judicial scrutiny are negatively affecting the attorney-client privilege claims of in-house counsel. The article spotlight the factors that are causing technology to negatively impact in-house privilege claims. This includes a discussion regarding the historical basis for increased court scrutiny of such claims. The article also examines how the indiscriminate use of email by corporations has invited the courts to view those claims with even greater skepticism. The article then explores how such skepticism bodes poorly for organizations as they attempt to protect their internal lawyers’ claims from the transparency that social networks, cloud computing, and BYOD provide into their discussions. Finally, the article offers some practical suggestions that can help mitigate the impact of these technological challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Richmond Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Richmond Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Richmond Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文描述了数字时代技术和高度司法审查如何对内部律师的律师-客户特权索赔产生负面影响。本文重点介绍了导致技术对内部特权要求产生负面影响的因素。这包括关于增加法院审查这类索赔的历史基础的讨论。这篇文章还探讨了企业不加区分地使用电子邮件是如何促使法院以更大的怀疑态度看待这些主张的。这篇文章随后探讨了这样的怀疑对于那些试图保护其内部律师的主张不受社交网络、云计算和BYOD提供的透明度影响的组织来说是多么糟糕的预兆。最后,本文提供了一些实用的建议,可以帮助减轻这些技术挑战的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inviting Scrutiny: How Technologies are Eroding the Attorney-Client Privilege
This article describes how digital age technologies and heightened judicial scrutiny are negatively affecting the attorney-client privilege claims of in-house counsel. The article spotlight the factors that are causing technology to negatively impact in-house privilege claims. This includes a discussion regarding the historical basis for increased court scrutiny of such claims. The article also examines how the indiscriminate use of email by corporations has invited the courts to view those claims with even greater skepticism. The article then explores how such skepticism bodes poorly for organizations as they attempt to protect their internal lawyers’ claims from the transparency that social networks, cloud computing, and BYOD provide into their discussions. Finally, the article offers some practical suggestions that can help mitigate the impact of these technological challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信