循环流化床电厂棕榈壳与煤共烧的评价

N. Cahyo, Eko Hariyostanto, Hariana
{"title":"循环流化床电厂棕榈壳与煤共烧的评价","authors":"N. Cahyo, Eko Hariyostanto, Hariana","doi":"10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The biomass-coal co-firing test was carried out at the Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) power plant to evaluate operating parameters, economical fuel cost, and emission changes. Without modification, fuel mixing was carried out at the coal yard. Collecting data and sampling measurement is performed under the performance testing standards. The result shows that co-firing 5% PKS and 10% PKS in the CFB power plant contributes to an increase in the average temperature of the upper furnace, bed, and seal pot. The bed and air chamber pressure increased during the co-firing test. Besides, the total fuel flow and flue gas temperature have decreased. Furthermore, the SO2, NOx, and CO emissions are increased compared to baseline conditions. Changes in operating parameters are still on the normal operating range. The potential for corrosion due to chlorine is in a minor category. Specific fuel consumption in scenarios B and C decreased by 1.51 % and 1.90%, respectively, compared to the baseline condition. The fuel cost in scenarios B and C is lower by Rp. 9,-and Rp. 15,-per kWh compared to scenario A.","PeriodicalId":163424,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Co-firing Palm Kernel Shell with Coal on CFB Power plant\",\"authors\":\"N. Cahyo, Eko Hariyostanto, Hariana\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The biomass-coal co-firing test was carried out at the Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) power plant to evaluate operating parameters, economical fuel cost, and emission changes. Without modification, fuel mixing was carried out at the coal yard. Collecting data and sampling measurement is performed under the performance testing standards. The result shows that co-firing 5% PKS and 10% PKS in the CFB power plant contributes to an increase in the average temperature of the upper furnace, bed, and seal pot. The bed and air chamber pressure increased during the co-firing test. Besides, the total fuel flow and flue gas temperature have decreased. Furthermore, the SO2, NOx, and CO emissions are increased compared to baseline conditions. Changes in operating parameters are still on the normal operating range. The potential for corrosion due to chlorine is in a minor category. Specific fuel consumption in scenarios B and C decreased by 1.51 % and 1.90%, respectively, compared to the baseline condition. The fuel cost in scenarios B and C is lower by Rp. 9,-and Rp. 15,-per kWh compared to scenario A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在循环流化床(CFB)电厂进行了生物质-煤共烧试验,以评估运行参数、经济性燃料成本和排放变化。未经改造,燃料混合在煤场进行。在性能测试标准下进行数据收集和抽样测量。结果表明:在循环流化床电厂共烧5% PKS和10% PKS时,上炉、床层和密封釜的平均温度升高,床层和气室压力升高。此外,总燃料流量和烟气温度也有所降低。此外,与基线条件相比,SO2、NOx和CO排放量也有所增加。运行参数的变化仍在正常运行范围内。氯气腐蚀的可能性很小。与基线条件相比,方案B和方案C的油耗分别下降了1.51%和1.90%。与方案A相比,方案B和方案C的燃料成本每千瓦时分别低了9卢比和15卢比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Co-firing Palm Kernel Shell with Coal on CFB Power plant
The biomass-coal co-firing test was carried out at the Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) power plant to evaluate operating parameters, economical fuel cost, and emission changes. Without modification, fuel mixing was carried out at the coal yard. Collecting data and sampling measurement is performed under the performance testing standards. The result shows that co-firing 5% PKS and 10% PKS in the CFB power plant contributes to an increase in the average temperature of the upper furnace, bed, and seal pot. The bed and air chamber pressure increased during the co-firing test. Besides, the total fuel flow and flue gas temperature have decreased. Furthermore, the SO2, NOx, and CO emissions are increased compared to baseline conditions. Changes in operating parameters are still on the normal operating range. The potential for corrosion due to chlorine is in a minor category. Specific fuel consumption in scenarios B and C decreased by 1.51 % and 1.90%, respectively, compared to the baseline condition. The fuel cost in scenarios B and C is lower by Rp. 9,-and Rp. 15,-per kWh compared to scenario A.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信