如何尊重宗教类他者?金班吉道成肉身学说研究的方法论思考

Mika Vähäkangas
{"title":"如何尊重宗教类他者?金班吉道成肉身学说研究的方法论思考","authors":"Mika Vähäkangas","doi":"10.1163/9789004412255_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines a methodology for theologically analyzing and assessing predominantly oral non-Western theologies. First, the two major existing approaches are deliberated upon, namely, the (cultural/social) anthropology of Christianity and ecumenical (systematic) theology.1 After exploring the pros and cons of both, a brief background of the Kimbanguist Church is presented, which serves as the case for reflecting upon methodological considerations. This is followed by an attempt to integrate the useful elements of both anthropology and theology. The whole exercise is conducted with the ecumenical theological agenda in mind, and therefore does not propose any value judgment on theological and anthropological or ethnographical approaches as such. The Kimbanguist doctrine of incarnation is used as the concrete material for methodological deliberations because of its critical situation at the moment of writing – the Kimbanguist Church is very close to becoming the first ever the grounds. Furthermore, it is a leading African Instituted Church with a rich oral theological tradition and deep involvement in the Kongo cultural heritage.","PeriodicalId":131591,"journal":{"name":"Faith in African Lived Christianity","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Respect the Religious Quasi-Other? Methodological Considerations in Studying the Kimbanguist Doctrine of Incarnation\",\"authors\":\"Mika Vähäkangas\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004412255_008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter outlines a methodology for theologically analyzing and assessing predominantly oral non-Western theologies. First, the two major existing approaches are deliberated upon, namely, the (cultural/social) anthropology of Christianity and ecumenical (systematic) theology.1 After exploring the pros and cons of both, a brief background of the Kimbanguist Church is presented, which serves as the case for reflecting upon methodological considerations. This is followed by an attempt to integrate the useful elements of both anthropology and theology. The whole exercise is conducted with the ecumenical theological agenda in mind, and therefore does not propose any value judgment on theological and anthropological or ethnographical approaches as such. The Kimbanguist doctrine of incarnation is used as the concrete material for methodological deliberations because of its critical situation at the moment of writing – the Kimbanguist Church is very close to becoming the first ever the grounds. Furthermore, it is a leading African Instituted Church with a rich oral theological tradition and deep involvement in the Kongo cultural heritage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faith in African Lived Christianity\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faith in African Lived Christianity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004412255_008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faith in African Lived Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004412255_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章概述了神学分析和评估主要是非西方口头神学的方法。首先,讨论了两种主要的现有方法,即基督教的(文化/社会)人类学和普世(系统)神学在探讨了两者的利弊之后,简要介绍了金班吉派教会的背景,这是反思方法论考虑的案例。接下来是尝试整合人类学和神学的有用元素。整个实践是在考虑到普世神学议程的情况下进行的,因此不会对神学和人类学或民族志方法提出任何价值判断。金班吉主义的化身教义被用作方法论讨论的具体材料,因为它在写作时的危急情况-金班吉主义教会非常接近成为第一个理由。此外,它是一个领先的非洲建立教会,拥有丰富的口头神学传统和深入参与刚果文化遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Respect the Religious Quasi-Other? Methodological Considerations in Studying the Kimbanguist Doctrine of Incarnation
This chapter outlines a methodology for theologically analyzing and assessing predominantly oral non-Western theologies. First, the two major existing approaches are deliberated upon, namely, the (cultural/social) anthropology of Christianity and ecumenical (systematic) theology.1 After exploring the pros and cons of both, a brief background of the Kimbanguist Church is presented, which serves as the case for reflecting upon methodological considerations. This is followed by an attempt to integrate the useful elements of both anthropology and theology. The whole exercise is conducted with the ecumenical theological agenda in mind, and therefore does not propose any value judgment on theological and anthropological or ethnographical approaches as such. The Kimbanguist doctrine of incarnation is used as the concrete material for methodological deliberations because of its critical situation at the moment of writing – the Kimbanguist Church is very close to becoming the first ever the grounds. Furthermore, it is a leading African Instituted Church with a rich oral theological tradition and deep involvement in the Kongo cultural heritage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信