隔离及超越:系统安全的挑战

T. Hunt, Zhipeng Jia, Vance Miller, C. Rossbach, E. Witchel
{"title":"隔离及超越:系统安全的挑战","authors":"T. Hunt, Zhipeng Jia, Vance Miller, C. Rossbach, E. Witchel","doi":"10.1145/3317550.3321427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System security has historically relied on hardware-provided isolation primitives. However, Meltdown [36] and Spectre [30] demonstrate that basic user/kernel isolation could be bypassed in every widely deployed ISA for decades; they are a caution to system designers who accept hardware isolation guarantees as an article of faith. Hardware isolation is fallible and should be considered fallible by software systems. We argue that future systems should broaden their view to adopt techniques that compensate for weaknesses in hardware isolation and should secure and optimize the communication among isolated components. Changing algorithms to be data oblivious, so that their externally observable behavior is independent of their (secret) input data is one such technique. Securing communication requires that the timing and size of messages be independent of secret data, but how best to achieve that independence so as to limit performance and energy overheads will vary from application to application.","PeriodicalId":224944,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation and Beyond: Challenges for System Security\",\"authors\":\"T. Hunt, Zhipeng Jia, Vance Miller, C. Rossbach, E. Witchel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3317550.3321427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System security has historically relied on hardware-provided isolation primitives. However, Meltdown [36] and Spectre [30] demonstrate that basic user/kernel isolation could be bypassed in every widely deployed ISA for decades; they are a caution to system designers who accept hardware isolation guarantees as an article of faith. Hardware isolation is fallible and should be considered fallible by software systems. We argue that future systems should broaden their view to adopt techniques that compensate for weaknesses in hardware isolation and should secure and optimize the communication among isolated components. Changing algorithms to be data oblivious, so that their externally observable behavior is independent of their (secret) input data is one such technique. Securing communication requires that the timing and size of messages be independent of secret data, but how best to achieve that independence so as to limit performance and energy overheads will vary from application to application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3317550.3321427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3317550.3321427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

系统安全性历来依赖于硬件提供的隔离原语。然而,Meltdown[36]和Spectre[30]表明,几十年来,每个广泛部署的ISA都可以绕过基本的用户/内核隔离;对于那些将硬件隔离保证作为一种信条的系统设计师来说,它们是一种警告。硬件隔离是不可靠的,软件系统也应该认为是不可靠的。我们认为,未来的系统应该扩大他们的视野,采用技术来弥补硬件隔离的弱点,并应确保和优化隔离组件之间的通信。将算法更改为数据无关的,以便它们的外部可观察行为独立于它们的(秘密)输入数据就是这样一种技术。保护通信要求消息的时间和大小独立于秘密数据,但是如何最好地实现这种独立性以限制性能和能源开销将因应用程序而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolation and Beyond: Challenges for System Security
System security has historically relied on hardware-provided isolation primitives. However, Meltdown [36] and Spectre [30] demonstrate that basic user/kernel isolation could be bypassed in every widely deployed ISA for decades; they are a caution to system designers who accept hardware isolation guarantees as an article of faith. Hardware isolation is fallible and should be considered fallible by software systems. We argue that future systems should broaden their view to adopt techniques that compensate for weaknesses in hardware isolation and should secure and optimize the communication among isolated components. Changing algorithms to be data oblivious, so that their externally observable behavior is independent of their (secret) input data is one such technique. Securing communication requires that the timing and size of messages be independent of secret data, but how best to achieve that independence so as to limit performance and energy overheads will vary from application to application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信